PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSIAX vs. FXNAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSIAX vs. FXNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSIAX achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly higher than FXNAX's -0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FSIAX has outperformed FXNAX with an annualized return of 3.60%, while FXNAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.25% annualized return.


FSIAX

1D
0.25%
1M
-1.33%
6M
0.88%
YTD
1.61%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
6.42%
5Y*
2.17%
10Y*
3.60%
ALL TIME*
6.26%

FXNAX

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.25%
6M
-0.85%
YTD
-0.63%
1Y
1.77%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
-0.49%
10Y*
1.25%
ALL TIME*
1.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSIAX vs. FXNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSIAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M
1.61%8.59%5.03%8.83%-12.06%3.22%7.30%10.76%-2.93%7.54%
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
-0.63%7.14%1.35%5.82%-13.55%-2.10%7.63%8.50%0.04%3.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FSIAX and FXNAX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2011

0.56

The correlation between FSIAX and FXNAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSIAX vs. FXNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSIAX
FSIAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FSIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FXNAX
FXNAX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FXNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FXNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSIAX vs. FXNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSIAXFXNAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.14

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

1.01

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.93

2.55

+5.38

FSIAX vs. FXNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the FXNAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSIAX and FXNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSIAX vs. FXNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSIAX drawdown since its inception was -17.81%, smaller than the maximum FXNAX drawdown of -19.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIAX and FXNAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSIAXFXNAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.81%

-19.51%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-2.94%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.72%

-5.11%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.19%

-18.54%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.19%

-19.51%

+3.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-3.89%

+2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.83%

-3.86%

+2.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

1.17%

-0.47%

Volatility

FSIAX vs. FXNAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) have volatilities of 1.00% and 0.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSIAXFXNAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

0.99%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.28%

3.02%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77%

3.85%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.56%

6.07%

-1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.45%

5.01%

-0.56%

FSIAX vs. FXNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSIAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FXNAX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSIAX vs. FXNAX - Dividend Comparison

FSIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than FXNAX's 3.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSIAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M
3.78%4.06%3.21%3.71%2.71%4.01%4.32%4.07%3.51%3.70%3.49%3.18%
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
3.46%3.58%3.40%3.15%1.81%1.74%2.92%2.68%2.74%2.57%2.76%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSIAX and FXNAX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSIAX has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to FXNAX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSIAX dropped -17.81% vs FXNAX's -19.51%.

FSIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSIAX and FXNAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer