PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSHBX vs. FNSOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSHBX vs. FNSOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund (FNSOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSHBX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly higher than FNSOX's 0.27% return.


FSHBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.56%
6M
1.00%
1Y
3.50%
3Y*
4.78%
5Y*
2.24%
10Y*
2.12%

FNSOX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.62%
1Y
3.46%
3Y*
4.44%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSHBX vs. FNSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSHBX
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund
0.56%5.49%4.73%5.35%-3.86%-0.92%3.59%4.20%1.21%-0.05%
FNSOX
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund
0.27%6.01%3.90%4.90%-5.76%-1.25%4.28%4.95%1.14%-0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FSHBX and FNSOX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2017

0.80

The correlation between FSHBX and FNSOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSHBX vs. FNSOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSHBX
FSHBX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FSHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FSHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FNSOX
FNSOX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FNSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSHBX vs. FNSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund (FNSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSHBXFNSOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.36

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

2.50

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.12

8.25

+3.86

FSHBX vs. FNSOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSHBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the FNSOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSHBX and FNSOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSHBXFNSOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

1.78

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.55

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

0.83

+0.66

Drawdowns

FSHBX vs. FNSOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSHBX drawdown since its inception was -8.80%, roughly equal to the maximum FNSOX drawdown of -8.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSHBX and FNSOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSHBXFNSOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

-8.92%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.17%

-1.47%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.17%

-1.51%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.36%

-8.77%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.70%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-1.73%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.31%

0.45%

-0.14%

Volatility

FSHBX vs. FNSOX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund (FNSOX) have volatilities of 0.62% and 0.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSHBXFNSOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

0.65%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.42%

1.51%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97%

2.07%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.21%

2.89%

-0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.86%

2.47%

-0.61%

FSHBX vs. FNSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSHBX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FNSOX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSHBX vs. FNSOX - Dividend Comparison

FSHBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than FNSOX's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNSOX
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund
3.53%3.22%2.80%1.74%0.81%0.80%1.54%2.61%2.04%0.34%0.00%0.00%
FSHBX
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund
4.17%4.26%4.00%3.00%0.83%1.04%2.62%2.13%1.78%1.27%1.12%0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSHBX and FNSOX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNSOX has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to FSHBX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSHBX dropped -8.80% vs FNSOX's -8.92%.

FSHBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSHBX and FNSOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer