PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNSOX vs. VBTLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNSOX vs. VBTLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund (FNSOX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBTLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNSOX achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than VBTLX's 0.42% return.


FNSOX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.17%
6M
0.52%
1Y
3.36%
3Y*
4.52%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*

VBTLX

1D
0.31%
1M
0.97%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.76%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
4.08%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
1.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNSOX vs. VBTLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNSOX
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund
0.17%6.01%3.90%4.90%-5.76%-1.25%4.28%4.95%1.14%-0.22%
VBTLX
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.42%7.17%1.26%5.74%-13.16%-1.81%7.72%8.73%-0.25%0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FNSOX and VBTLX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2017

0.82

The correlation between FNSOX and VBTLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNSOX vs. VBTLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNSOX
FNSOX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FNSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

VBTLX
VBTLX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VBTLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBTLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBTLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
VBTLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBTLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNSOX vs. VBTLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund (FNSOX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBTLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNSOXVBTLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.21

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

1.63

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.15

4.63

+2.52

FNSOX vs. VBTLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNSOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the VBTLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNSOX and VBTLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNSOX vs. VBTLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNSOX drawdown since its inception was -8.92%, smaller than the maximum VBTLX drawdown of -18.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNSOX and VBTLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNSOXVBTLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.92%

-18.81%

+9.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-2.89%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.51%

-6.00%

+4.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.77%

-18.14%

+9.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-2.18%

+1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.73%

-2.67%

+0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

1.01%

-0.54%

Volatility

FNSOX vs. VBTLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund (FNSOX) is 0.73%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBTLX) has a volatility of 1.21%. This indicates that FNSOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBTLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNSOXVBTLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

1.21%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.56%

2.86%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08%

3.90%

-1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.89%

6.01%

-3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.47%

4.99%

-2.52%

FNSOX vs. VBTLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNSOX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VBTLX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNSOX vs. VBTLX - Dividend Comparison

FNSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, less than VBTLX's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNSOX
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund
3.53%3.22%2.80%1.74%0.81%0.80%1.54%2.61%2.04%0.34%0.00%0.00%
VBTLX
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Admiral Shares
3.98%3.87%3.69%3.10%2.59%1.96%2.39%2.74%2.57%2.56%2.53%2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNSOX and VBTLX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBTLX has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to FNSOX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNSOX dropped -8.92% vs VBTLX's -18.81%.

FNSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNSOX and VBTLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer