FSDPX vs. RSPM
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM).
FSDPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 28, 1986. RSPM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006.
Performance
FSDPX vs. RSPM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSDPX vs. RSPM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSDPX Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio | 9.58% | 11.32% | -2.95% | 7.29% | -9.86% | 31.66% | 21.78% | 12.40% | -23.74% | 25.99% |
RSPM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF | 13.67% | 6.90% | -1.30% | 8.32% | -9.95% | 31.21% | 22.77% | 25.11% | -14.75% | 25.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSDPX achieves a 9.58% return, which is significantly lower than RSPM's 13.67% return. Over the past 10 years, FSDPX has underperformed RSPM with an annualized return of 8.22%, while RSPM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.14% annualized return.
FSDPX
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -7.63%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 6M
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 20.48%
- 3Y*
- 7.08%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
RSPM
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -4.12%
- YTD
- 13.67%
- 6M
- 18.88%
- 1Y
- 23.99%
- 3Y*
- 7.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 11.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSDPX vs. RSPM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSDPX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSDPX vs. RSPM — Risk / Return Rank
FSDPX
RSPM
FSDPX vs. RSPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSDPX | RSPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | 1.06 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 1.62 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 1.61 | -0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.68 | 5.31 | -0.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSDPX | RSPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 1.06 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.51 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.39 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSDPX and RSPM is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSDPX vs. RSPM - Dividend Comparison
FSDPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than RSPM's 1.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSDPX Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio | 1.77% | 1.94% | 12.46% | 5.46% | 3.34% | 0.71% | 0.68% | 1.22% | 12.89% | 5.08% | 1.05% | 2.42% |
RSPM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF | 1.52% | 2.06% | 2.04% | 2.05% | 2.19% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.81% | 1.83% | 1.50% | 1.28% | 1.57% |
Drawdowns
FSDPX vs. RSPM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSDPX drawdown since its inception was -64.19%, roughly equal to the maximum RSPM drawdown of -61.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSDPX and RSPM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSDPX | RSPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.19% | -61.18% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.53% | -15.67% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.39% | -27.19% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.89% | -39.84% | -10.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.63% | -5.87% | -1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.33% | -8.83% | -2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 4.74% | -0.74% |
Volatility
FSDPX vs. RSPM - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) have volatilities of 6.64% and 6.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSDPX | RSPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 6.48% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.61% | 13.58% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.54% | 22.71% | -2.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.29% | 20.12% | +0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.64% | 21.91% | -0.27% |