PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCRX vs. WFDDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSCRX vs. WFDDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund (FSCRX) and Allspring Discovery SMID Cap Growth Fund (WFDDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FSCRX having a 18.79% return and WFDDX slightly higher at 19.60%. Over the past 10 years, FSCRX has underperformed WFDDX with an annualized return of 10.58%, while WFDDX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.68% annualized return.


FSCRX

1D
1.05%
1M
6.29%
YTD
18.79%
6M
16.69%
1Y
34.21%
3Y*
16.06%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
10.58%

WFDDX

1D
0.78%
1M
6.98%
YTD
19.60%
6M
16.52%
1Y
26.55%
3Y*
16.46%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
13.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSCRX vs. WFDDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSCRX
Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund
18.79%10.89%2.75%21.28%-16.68%35.66%6.87%27.31%-14.06%7.71%
WFDDX
Allspring Discovery SMID Cap Growth Fund
19.60%5.51%18.05%20.25%-37.83%-6.10%61.81%61.34%-6.95%29.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCRX and WFDDX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2005

0.82

The correlation between FSCRX and WFDDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSCRX vs. WFDDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCRX
FSCRX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FSCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

WFDDX
WFDDX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
WFDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
WFDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCRX vs. WFDDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund (FSCRX) and Allspring Discovery SMID Cap Growth Fund (WFDDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSCRXWFDDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.23

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

1.91

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.54

7.00

+3.54

FSCRX vs. WFDDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the WFDDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCRX and WFDDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSCRX vs. WFDDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCRX drawdown since its inception was -56.27%, roughly equal to the maximum WFDDX drawdown of -59.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCRX and WFDDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCRXWFDDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.27%

-59.22%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.34%

-14.77%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.51%

-27.05%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.91%

-59.22%

+33.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.06%

-59.22%

+12.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-20.34%

+20.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-16.28%

+8.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

4.03%

-0.60%

Volatility

FSCRX vs. WFDDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund (FSCRX) and Allspring Discovery SMID Cap Growth Fund (WFDDX) have volatilities of 6.89% and 7.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSCRXWFDDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.89%

7.22%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.15%

17.65%

-3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.71%

21.62%

-2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.32%

33.45%

-13.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.79%

29.31%

-7.52%

FSCRX vs. WFDDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCRX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than WFDDX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSCRX vs. WFDDX - Dividend Comparison

FSCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.74%, less than WFDDX's 14.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCRX
Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund
12.74%14.70%13.03%4.44%11.56%6.12%2.79%7.46%35.48%13.68%0.44%7.28%
WFDDX
Allspring Discovery SMID Cap Growth Fund
14.35%17.17%9.33%0.00%1.35%36.45%4.93%26.87%19.12%17.95%1.32%8.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSCRX and WFDDX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WFDDX has higher volatility (7.22%) compared to FSCRX (6.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCRX dropped -56.27% vs WFDDX's -59.22%.

FSCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSCRX and WFDDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer