WFDDX vs. DFFVX
WFDDX (Allspring Discovery SMID Cap Growth Fund) and DFFVX (DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class) are both mutual funds - WFDDX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Allspring, while DFFVX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Over the past 10 years, WFDDX returned 11.93%/yr vs 11.41%/yr for DFFVX. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. WFDDX charges 1.11%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for DFFVX.
Performance
WFDDX vs. DFFVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFDDX achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than DFFVX's 19.98% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WFDDX having a 11.93% annualized return and DFFVX not far behind at 11.41%.
WFDDX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -7.56%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- 12.59%
- 3Y*
- 11.15%
- 5Y*
- -1.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.43%
DFFVX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- YTD
- 19.98%
- 1Y
- 35.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
WFDDX vs. DFFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFDDX Allspring Discovery SMID Cap Growth Fund | 8.56% | 5.51% | 18.05% | 20.25% | -37.83% | -6.10% | 61.81% | 61.34% | -6.95% | 29.27% |
DFFVX DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class | 19.98% | 9.53% | 9.34% | 19.37% | -4.66% | 31.53% | 3.78% | 21.51% | -15.79% | 9.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between WFDDX and DFFVX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2005 | 0.79 |
The correlation between WFDDX and DFFVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (10 years) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WFDDX vs. DFFVX — Risk / Return Rank
WFDDX
DFFVX
WFDDX vs. DFFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Discovery SMID Cap Growth Fund (WFDDX) and DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class (DFFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WFDDX | DFFVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.36 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 3.41 | -2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.42 | 11.57 | -9.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WFDDX vs. DFFVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFDDX drawdown since its inception was -59.22%, smaller than the maximum DFFVX drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFDDX and DFFVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFDDX | DFFVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.22% | -64.21% | +4.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.77% | -9.70% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.05% | -26.09% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.22% | -26.09% | -33.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.22% | -50.75% | -8.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.70% | -1.06% | -26.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.32% | -9.65% | -6.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.55% | 2.85% | +1.70% |
Volatility
WFDDX vs. DFFVX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Discovery SMID Cap Growth Fund (WFDDX) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class (DFFVX) at 3.34%. This indicates that WFDDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFFVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WFDDX | DFFVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 3.34% | +3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.67% | 10.49% | +8.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.51% | 16.35% | +6.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.52% | 21.26% | +12.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.32% | 23.55% | +5.77% |
WFDDX vs. DFFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WFDDX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than DFFVX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
WFDDX vs. DFFVX - Dividend Comparison
WFDDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.81%, more than DFFVX's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFFVX DFA U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio Institutional Class | 1.49% | 1.69% | 1.40% | 2.26% | 5.17% | 2.74% | 1.52% | 3.82% | 5.95% | 5.16% | 3.95% | 5.84% |
WFDDX Allspring Discovery SMID Cap Growth Fund | 15.81% | 17.17% | 9.33% | 0.00% | 1.35% | 36.45% | 4.93% | 26.87% | 19.12% | 17.95% | 1.32% | 8.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WFDDX and DFFVX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WFDDX has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to DFFVX (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFDDX dropped -59.22% vs DFFVX's -64.21%.
DFFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WFDDX and DFFVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer