PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCRX vs. NSVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSCRX vs. NSVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund (FSCRX) and Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II (NSVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCRX achieves a 17.56% return, which is significantly lower than NSVAX's 21.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCRX has underperformed NSVAX with an annualized return of 10.09%, while NSVAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.85% annualized return.


FSCRX

1D
2.14%
1M
5.18%
YTD
17.56%
6M
15.04%
1Y
34.63%
3Y*
14.48%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
10.09%

NSVAX

1D
1.57%
1M
5.54%
YTD
21.35%
6M
19.03%
1Y
40.43%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
10.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSCRX vs. NSVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSCRX
Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund
17.56%10.89%2.75%21.28%-16.68%35.66%6.87%27.31%-14.06%7.71%
NSVAX
Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II
21.35%8.20%11.25%14.10%-13.70%34.27%10.11%20.65%-17.48%10.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCRX and NSVAX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2002

0.94

The correlation between FSCRX and NSVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSCRX vs. NSVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCRX
FSCRX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FSCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

NSVAX
NSVAX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NSVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
NSVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCRX vs. NSVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund (FSCRX) and Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II (NSVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSCRXNSVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.41

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

4.26

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.03

14.91

-4.89

FSCRX vs. NSVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the NSVAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCRX and NSVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSCRX vs. NSVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCRX drawdown since its inception was -56.27%, smaller than the maximum NSVAX drawdown of -59.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCRX and NSVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCRXNSVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.27%

-59.32%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.34%

-9.51%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.51%

-27.11%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.91%

-27.11%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.06%

-48.33%

+1.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.49%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-9.72%

+1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

2.71%

+0.72%

Volatility

FSCRX vs. NSVAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund (FSCRX) has a higher volatility of 7.11% compared to Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II (NSVAX) at 5.03%. This indicates that FSCRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NSVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSCRXNSVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.11%

5.03%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.15%

12.00%

+2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.65%

17.22%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.32%

22.41%

-2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.78%

23.90%

-2.12%

FSCRX vs. NSVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCRX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than NSVAX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSCRX vs. NSVAX - Dividend Comparison

FSCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.87%, more than NSVAX's 9.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCRX
Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund
12.87%14.70%13.03%4.44%11.56%6.12%2.79%7.46%35.48%13.68%0.44%7.28%
NSVAX
Columbia Small Cap Value Fund II
9.52%15.89%29.38%6.93%6.46%13.95%0.83%3.68%14.97%9.10%5.23%12.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSCRX and NSVAX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSCRX has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to NSVAX (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCRX dropped -56.27% vs NSVAX's -59.32%.

NSVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSCRX and NSVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer