PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCPX vs. USLUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSCPX vs. USLUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) and U.S. Global Investors Global Luxury Goods Fund (USLUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCPX achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly higher than USLUX's -4.45% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCPX has outperformed USLUX with an annualized return of 12.34%, while USLUX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.86% annualized return.


FSCPX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.83%
YTD
0.24%
6M
0.10%
1Y
13.87%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
12.34%

USLUX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.63%
YTD
-4.45%
6M
-1.18%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
10.00%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*
9.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSCPX vs. USLUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSCPX
Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio
0.24%7.88%24.56%41.81%-34.88%19.23%35.68%27.06%-1.03%21.70%
USLUX
U.S. Global Investors Global Luxury Goods Fund
-4.45%17.87%14.26%23.79%-23.91%25.14%20.76%13.72%-8.30%19.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCPX and USLUX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 1996

0.75

The correlation between FSCPX and USLUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSCPX vs. USLUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCPX
FSCPX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FSCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

USLUX
USLUX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
USLUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USLUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
USLUX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
USLUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
USLUX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCPX vs. USLUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) and U.S. Global Investors Global Luxury Goods Fund (USLUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSCPXUSLUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.07

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

0.39

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

1.10

+1.82

FSCPX vs. USLUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the USLUX Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCPX and USLUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSCPXUSLUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

0.32

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.29

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.50

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.19

+0.35

Drawdowns

FSCPX vs. USLUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCPX drawdown since its inception was -57.76%, smaller than the maximum USLUX drawdown of -77.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCPX and USLUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCPXUSLUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.76%

-77.61%

+19.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.99%

-15.68%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.71%

-20.96%

-6.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.23%

-33.85%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.23%

-34.51%

-4.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.05%

-6.88%

+1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.55%

-42.09%

+33.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

5.54%

-0.52%

Volatility

FSCPX vs. USLUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) is 5.99%, while U.S. Global Investors Global Luxury Goods Fund (USLUX) has a volatility of 6.94%. This indicates that FSCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USLUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSCPXUSLUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

6.94%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.67%

14.72%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.93%

19.18%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.78%

20.88%

+3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.72%

19.68%

+3.04%

FSCPX vs. USLUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCPX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than USLUX's 1.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSCPX vs. USLUX - Dividend Comparison

FSCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.17%, more than USLUX's 8.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCPX
Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio
9.17%5.78%7.41%2.17%13.79%9.08%1.16%2.22%3.32%3.72%0.90%3.81%
USLUX
U.S. Global Investors Global Luxury Goods Fund
8.25%7.88%9.94%2.71%6.40%15.37%0.12%2.31%16.18%13.87%8.35%8.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSCPX and USLUX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USLUX has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to FSCPX (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCPX dropped -57.76% vs USLUX's -77.61%.

FSCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSCPX and USLUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer