FSCPX vs. FTIHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX).
FSCPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 28, 1990. FTIHX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI (All Country World Index) ex USA Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016.
Performance
FSCPX vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSCPX vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCPX Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio | -8.17% | 7.88% | 24.56% | 41.81% | -34.88% | 19.23% | 35.68% | 27.06% | -1.03% | 21.70% |
FTIHX Fidelity Total International Index Fund | 1.79% | 32.59% | 4.98% | 15.49% | -16.29% | 8.45% | 11.09% | 21.50% | -14.40% | 25.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSCPX achieves a -8.17% return, which is significantly lower than FTIHX's 1.79% return.
FSCPX
- 1D
- 3.54%
- 1M
- -5.61%
- YTD
- -8.17%
- 6M
- -7.40%
- 1Y
- 13.69%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
FTIHX
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- -7.01%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 27.20%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 7.14%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSCPX vs. FTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSCPX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIHX's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSCPX vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank
FSCPX
FTIHX
FSCPX vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSCPX | FTIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 1.74 | -1.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.08 | 2.32 | -1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.35 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 2.38 | -1.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.19 | 9.30 | -6.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSCPX | FTIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.74 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.48 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.56 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSCPX and FTIHX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FSCPX vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison
FSCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, more than FTIHX's 2.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCPX Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio | 6.30% | 5.78% | 7.41% | 2.17% | 13.79% | 9.08% | 1.16% | 2.22% | 3.32% | 3.72% | 0.90% | 3.81% |
FTIHX Fidelity Total International Index Fund | 2.73% | 2.78% | 2.88% | 2.78% | 2.51% | 2.55% | 1.62% | 2.61% | 2.21% | 0.45% | 0.47% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FSCPX vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSCPX drawdown since its inception was -57.76%, which is greater than FTIHX's maximum drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCPX and FTIHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSCPX | FTIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.76% | -35.75% | -22.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.99% | -11.25% | -4.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.23% | -29.99% | -9.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.02% | -8.61% | -4.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.56% | -7.31% | -1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.69% | 2.88% | +1.81% |
Volatility
FSCPX vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) have volatilities of 7.52% and 7.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSCPX | FTIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.52% | 7.78% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.97% | 11.04% | +2.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.89% | 16.05% | +8.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 15.09% | +9.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.62% | 16.02% | +6.60% |