PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCNX vs. TPDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FSCNX vs. TPDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class C (FSCNX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FSCNX vs. TPDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSCNX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class C
-2.81%15.36%8.35%13.51%-17.12%10.69%14.85%19.32%-7.54%14.93%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
7.48%23.97%5.29%7.71%-5.63%12.15%8.83%13.77%-7.24%4.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCNX achieves a -2.81% return, which is significantly lower than TPDAX's 7.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSCNX having a 6.79% annualized return and TPDAX not far ahead at 7.10%.


FSCNX

1D
-0.18%
1M
-6.76%
YTD
-2.81%
6M
-0.51%
1Y
12.71%
3Y*
9.39%
5Y*
4.43%
10Y*
6.79%

TPDAX

1D
0.05%
1M
-6.08%
YTD
7.48%
6M
12.53%
1Y
24.49%
3Y*
13.72%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*
7.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSCNX vs. TPDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCNX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than TPDAX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FSCNX vs. TPDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCNX
FSCNX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FSCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

TPDAX
TPDAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
TPDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
TPDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCNX vs. TPDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class C (FSCNX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSCNXTPDAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.14

2.07

-0.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.63

2.68

-1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.39

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

3.33

-1.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.29

12.75

-6.46

FSCNX vs. TPDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the TPDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCNX and TPDAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSCNXTPDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

2.07

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.95

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.72

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.58

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between FSCNX and TPDAX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FSCNX vs. TPDAX - Dividend Comparison

FSCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than TPDAX's 0.75% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCNX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class C
4.97%4.83%2.17%0.85%3.16%1.48%0.87%3.07%3.50%1.81%0.20%3.10%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
0.75%0.80%2.76%2.35%4.48%0.50%0.00%2.89%2.69%0.13%0.33%0.00%

Drawdowns

FSCNX vs. TPDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCNX drawdown since its inception was -42.29%, which is greater than TPDAX's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCNX and TPDAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCNXTPDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.29%

-22.29%

-20.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.00%

-7.58%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.16%

-17.58%

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.47%

-22.29%

-2.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.19%

-6.56%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.05%

-4.94%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.98%

-0.13%

Volatility

FSCNX vs. TPDAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class C (FSCNX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) have volatilities of 4.11% and 4.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FSCNXTPDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

4.00%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.84%

9.73%

-2.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.16%

12.21%

-1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.69%

10.12%

+0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.88%

9.86%

+1.02%