PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCNX vs. FSLCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSCNX vs. FSLCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class C (FSCNX) and Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCNX achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly lower than FSLCX's 16.37% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCNX has underperformed FSLCX with an annualized return of 7.90%, while FSLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.14% annualized return.


FSCNX

1D
0.44%
1M
3.78%
YTD
9.92%
6M
10.58%
1Y
22.21%
3Y*
13.50%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
7.90%

FSLCX

1D
1.27%
1M
5.82%
YTD
16.37%
6M
15.55%
1Y
33.11%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSCNX vs. FSLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSCNX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class C
9.92%15.36%8.35%13.51%-17.12%10.69%14.85%19.32%-7.54%14.93%
FSLCX
Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund
16.37%14.95%9.27%19.70%-22.71%20.26%13.80%29.46%-11.70%13.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCNX and FSLCX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2007

0.88

The correlation between FSCNX and FSLCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSCNX vs. FSLCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCNX
FSCNX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FSCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FSLCX
FSLCX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FSLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCNX vs. FSLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class C (FSCNX) and Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSCNXFSLCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.33

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

2.80

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.71

9.89

+3.82

FSCNX vs. FSLCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the FSLCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCNX and FSLCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSCNXFSLCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

1.91

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.33

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.48

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.42

+0.05

Drawdowns

FSCNX vs. FSLCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCNX drawdown since its inception was -42.29%, smaller than the maximum FSLCX drawdown of -61.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCNX and FSLCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCNXFSLCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.29%

-61.22%

+18.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.19%

-12.51%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.20%

-22.01%

+10.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.16%

-30.04%

+6.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.47%

-45.42%

+20.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-9.82%

+3.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

3.54%

-1.90%

Volatility

FSCNX vs. FSLCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class C (FSCNX) is 3.01%, while Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that FSCNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSCNXFSLCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

6.16%

-3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.47%

13.79%

-6.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.13%

18.37%

-9.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.80%

20.97%

-10.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.96%

21.23%

-10.27%

FSCNX vs. FSLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCNX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FSLCX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSCNX vs. FSLCX - Dividend Comparison

FSCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than FSLCX's 12.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCNX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class C
4.40%4.83%2.17%0.85%3.16%1.48%0.87%3.07%3.50%1.81%0.20%3.10%
FSLCX
Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund
12.81%14.91%1.86%0.02%7.91%22.97%0.00%0.31%26.25%8.92%3.85%10.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSCNX and FSLCX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSLCX has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to FSCNX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCNX dropped -42.29% vs FSLCX's -61.22%.

FSCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSCNX and FSLCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer