FSBDX vs. RYGRX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FSBDX (Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund) and RYGRX (Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FSBDX returned 23.30%/yr vs 14.07%/yr for RYGRX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSBDX charges 0.00%/yr vs 2.26%/yr for RYGRX.

Performance

FSBDX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSBDX achieves a 17.97% return, which is significantly lower than RYGRX's 35.24% return. Over the past 10 years, FSBDX has outperformed RYGRX with an annualized return of 23.30%, while RYGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.07% annualized return.

FSBDX

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: 3.32%
• YTD: 17.97%
• 6M: 16.75%
• 1Y: 42.72%
• 3Y*: 31.68%
• 5Y*: 16.24%
• 10Y*: 23.30%

RYGRX

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: 10.34%
• YTD: 35.24%
• 6M: 32.32%
• 1Y: 42.19%
• 3Y*: 27.04%
• 5Y*: 10.59%
• 10Y*: 14.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSBDX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSBDX Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund	17.97%	20.31%	39.76%	57.42%	-37.20%	22.53%	62.77%	33.24%	4.53%	35.27%
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund	35.24%	11.00%	25.73%	5.80%	-28.71%	26.61%	26.34%	34.13%	-6.28%	23.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FSBDX and RYGRX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2013	0.89

The correlation between FSBDX and RYGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSBDX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSBDX

FSBDX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FSBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FSBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FSBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FSBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FSBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

RYGRX

RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 66
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSBDX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSBDX	RYGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	2.05	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	2.75	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.36	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.53	3.96	-0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.47	14.75	-0.28

FSBDX vs. RYGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSBDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the RYGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSBDX and RYGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSBDX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSBDX drawdown since its inception was -42.25%, smaller than the maximum RYGRX drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSBDX and RYGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSBDX	RYGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.25%	-54.22%	+11.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.41%	-11.17%	-1.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.09%	-24.95%	-2.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.25%	-36.57%	-5.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.25%	-36.63%	-5.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.13%	0.00%	-2.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.22%	-9.39%	+2.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	2.99%	+0.03%

Volatility

FSBDX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) is 8.21%, while Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a volatility of 9.88%. This indicates that FSBDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSBDX	RYGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.21%	9.88%	-1.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.79%	18.39%	-3.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.91%	21.58%	-2.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.00%	23.83%	+1.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.62%	23.05%	+0.57%

FSBDX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSBDX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than RYGRX's 2.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSBDX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison

FSBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than RYGRX's 3.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSBDX Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund	3.16%	3.73%	8.92%	0.54%	3.93%	24.67%	40.16%	11.36%	15.87%	10.80%	1.41%	13.10%
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund	3.76%	5.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.81%	4.43%	12.10%	7.15%	6.26%	0.05%	2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSBDX and RYGRX in my portfolio?

FSBDX and RYGRX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSBDX or RYGRX?

RYGRX has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to FSBDX (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSBDX dropped -42.25% vs RYGRX's -54.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.