PortfoliosLab logo
FSBDX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FSBDX and FBGRX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Performance

FSBDX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-8.15%
-8.30%
FSBDX
FBGRX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FSBDX:

0.05

FBGRX:

0.36

Sortino Ratio

FSBDX:

0.27

FBGRX:

0.69

Omega Ratio

FSBDX:

1.04

FBGRX:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

FSBDX:

0.05

FBGRX:

0.38

Martin Ratio

FSBDX:

0.17

FBGRX:

1.25

Ulcer Index

FSBDX:

9.17%

FBGRX:

8.12%

Daily Std Dev

FSBDX:

28.94%

FBGRX:

27.98%

Max Drawdown

FSBDX:

-55.57%

FBGRX:

-57.42%

Current Drawdown

FSBDX:

-19.58%

FBGRX:

-16.58%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSBDX having a -12.45% return and FBGRX slightly lower at -12.57%. Over the past 10 years, FSBDX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 4.90%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.90% annualized return.


FSBDX

YTD

-12.45%

1M

0.64%

6M

-7.47%

1Y

-0.83%

5Y*

3.24%

10Y*

4.90%

FBGRX

YTD

-12.57%

1M

0.32%

6M

-7.60%

1Y

7.60%

5Y*

18.18%

10Y*

15.90%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSBDX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSBDX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for FBGRX: current value is 0.79%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FBGRX: 0.79%
Expense ratio chart for FSBDX: current value is 0.00%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FSBDX: 0.00%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSBDX vs. FBGRX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSBDX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSBDX is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSBDX is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSBDX is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSBDX is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSBDX is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSBDX is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBGRX is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FSBDX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for FSBDX, currently valued at 0.05, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.00
FSBDX: 0.05
FBGRX: 0.36
The chart of Sortino ratio for FSBDX, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
FSBDX: 0.27
FBGRX: 0.69
The chart of Omega ratio for FSBDX, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
FSBDX: 1.04
FBGRX: 1.10
The chart of Calmar ratio for FSBDX, currently valued at 0.05, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
FSBDX: 0.05
FBGRX: 0.38
The chart of Martin ratio for FSBDX, currently valued at 0.17, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.00
FSBDX: 0.17
FBGRX: 1.25

The current FSBDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSBDX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.05
0.36
FSBDX
FBGRX

Dividends

FSBDX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FSBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than FBGRX's 6.80% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FSBDX
Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund
0.80%0.70%0.54%0.63%0.33%0.60%0.72%0.93%0.53%0.28%11.66%1.20%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
6.80%5.95%0.93%0.57%8.73%6.40%3.70%6.32%4.28%4.05%5.07%6.08%

Drawdowns

FSBDX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSBDX drawdown since its inception was -55.57%, roughly equal to the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSBDX and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-19.58%
-16.58%
FSBDX
FBGRX

Volatility

FSBDX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) have volatilities of 18.14% and 18.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
18.14%
18.28%
FSBDX
FBGRX