FSBDX vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
FSBDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013. VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Performance
FSBDX vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSBDX vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSBDX Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund | -10.92% | 20.31% | 39.76% | 57.42% | -37.20% | 22.53% | 62.77% | 33.24% | 4.53% | 35.27% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | -9.79% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSBDX achieves a -10.92% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's -9.79% return. Over the past 10 years, FSBDX has outperformed VONG with an annualized return of 19.37%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively lower 16.65% annualized return.
FSBDX
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -8.78%
- YTD
- -10.92%
- 6M
- -7.85%
- 1Y
- 23.48%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.81%
- 10Y*
- 19.37%
VONG
- 1D
- 3.76%
- 1M
- -5.21%
- YTD
- -9.79%
- 6M
- -8.75%
- 1Y
- 18.79%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSBDX vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSBDX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FSBDX vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
FSBDX
VONG
FSBDX vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSBDX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 0.84 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | 1.36 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.19 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 1.16 | +0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.78 | 4.00 | +1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSBDX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 0.84 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.58 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.80 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.84 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSBDX and VONG is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSBDX vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
FSBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than VONG's 0.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSBDX Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund | 4.19% | 3.73% | 8.92% | 0.54% | 3.93% | 24.67% | 40.16% | 11.36% | 15.87% | 10.80% | 1.41% | 13.10% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.51% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
FSBDX vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSBDX drawdown since its inception was -42.25%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSBDX and VONG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSBDX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.25% | -32.72% | -9.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.65% | -16.23% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.25% | -32.72% | -9.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.25% | -32.72% | -9.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.41% | -13.09% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.32% | -4.90% | -2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 4.72% | -1.31% |
Volatility
FSBDX vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth Fund (FSBDX) is 6.07%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that FSBDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSBDX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 6.72% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.32% | 12.34% | +0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.53% | 22.40% | +2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.75% | 21.35% | +3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.41% | 20.82% | +2.59% |