FSBC vs. APH
FSBC (Five Star Bancorp) and APH (Amphenol Corporation) are both stocks. FSBC operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while APH operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 5 years, FSBC returned 14.68%/yr vs 38.82%/yr for APH. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FSBC vs. APH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSBC achieves a 30.55% return, which is significantly higher than APH's 23.05% return.
FSBC
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 9.25%
- YTD
- 30.55%
- 6M
- 26.24%
- 1Y
- 78.61%
- 3Y*
- 32.17%
- 5Y*
- 14.68%
- 10Y*
- —
APH
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 25.67%
- YTD
- 23.05%
- 6M
- 23.05%
- 1Y
- 77.83%
- 3Y*
- 61.78%
- 5Y*
- 38.82%
- 10Y*
- 29.01%
FSBC vs. APH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSBC Five Star Bancorp | 30.55% | 22.06% | 18.61% | -0.56% | -7.16% | 51.85% |
APH Amphenol Corporation | 23.05% | 96.08% | 41.30% | 31.85% | -11.96% | 32.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSBC and APH is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2021 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FSBC and APH has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
FSBC:
$4.21
APH:
$4.58
FSBC:
10.90
APH:
36.20
FSBC:
5.22
APH:
1.20
FSBC:
3.73
APH:
8.22
FSBC:
$196.28M
APH:
$25.90B
FSBC:
$114.56M
APH:
$9.67B
FSBC:
$64.83M
APH:
$7.45B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSBC vs. APH — Risk / Return Rank
FSBC
APH
FSBC vs. APH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Five Star Bancorp (FSBC) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSBC | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.32 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.04 | 2.78 | +3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.69 | 7.15 | +10.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSBC vs. APH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSBC drawdown since its inception was -40.76%, smaller than the maximum APH drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSBC and APH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSBC | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.76% | -63.41% | +22.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -28.19% | +15.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.42% | -28.19% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.76% | -28.73% | -12.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.21% | -13.55% | +0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 10.93% | -6.47% |
Volatility
FSBC vs. APH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Five Star Bancorp (FSBC) is 5.56%, while Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a volatility of 13.67%. This indicates that FSBC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSBC | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 13.67% | -8.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.90% | 36.74% | -20.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.95% | 41.80% | -15.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.43% | 30.80% | +0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.80% | 27.97% | +4.83% |
Dividends
FSBC vs. APH - Dividend Comparison
FSBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than APH's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.40% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 1.07% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% |
FSBC Five Star Bancorp | 2.51% | 2.24% | 2.66% | 2.86% | 2.20% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FSBC vs. APH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Five Star Bancorp and Amphenol Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FSBC and APH have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APH has higher volatility (13.67%) compared to FSBC (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSBC dropped -40.76% vs APH's -63.41%.
FSBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSBC and APH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer