FSATX vs. FASGX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FSATX (Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class M) and FASGX (Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, FSATX returned 8.30%/yr vs 9.96%/yr for FASGX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FSATX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FASGX.

Performance

FSATX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class M (FSATX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSATX achieves a 9.66% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 11.37% return. Over the past 10 years, FSATX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 8.30%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.

FSATX

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 3.12%
• YTD: 9.66%
• 6M: 10.70%
• 1Y: 22.45%
• 3Y*: 13.91%
• 5Y*: 6.54%
• 10Y*: 8.30%

FASGX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 3.62%
• YTD: 11.37%
• 6M: 12.72%
• 1Y: 26.17%
• 3Y*: 16.27%
• 5Y*: 8.25%
• 10Y*: 9.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSATX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSATX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class M	9.66%	15.89%	8.90%	14.20%	-16.71%	11.24%	15.43%	19.93%	-7.11%	15.06%
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	11.37%	18.23%	10.81%	16.45%	-16.83%	13.98%	17.19%	22.81%	-7.65%	17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FSATX and FASGX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2007	0.99

The correlation between FSATX and FASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSATX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSATX

FSATX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FSATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FSATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
FSATX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FSATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FSATX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

FASGX

FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSATX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class M (FSATX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSATX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	2.59	-0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	3.62	-0.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.49	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	3.34	-0.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.90	14.80	-0.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSATX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSATX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSATX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSATX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.52	2.59	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.68	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	0.79	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.63	-0.12

Drawdowns

FSATX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSATX drawdown since its inception was -41.95%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSATX and FASGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSATX	FASGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.95%	-47.35%	+5.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.18%	-7.95%	+0.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.05%	-12.80%	+1.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.75%	-23.54%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.42%	-27.20%	+2.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.72%	-6.71%	+0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	1.79%	-0.15%

Volatility

FSATX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class M (FSATX) is 2.96%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 3.29%. This indicates that FSATX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSATX	FASGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.96%	3.29%	-0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.45%	8.38%	-0.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.11%	10.35%	-1.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.80%	12.26%	-1.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.96%	12.65%	-1.69%

FSATX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSATX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSATX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

FSATX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, less than FASGX's 6.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	6.59%	7.33%	4.60%	1.72%	6.69%	2.73%	2.20%	5.19%	6.31%	2.75%	0.20%	5.58%
FSATX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class M	4.87%	5.34%	2.74%	1.42%	3.88%	2.01%	1.37%	3.59%	3.94%	1.79%	0.20%	3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSATX and FASGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, FSATX and FASGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FSATX or FASGX?

FASGX has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to FSATX (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSATX dropped -41.95% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.