PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSAGX vs. FSPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSAGX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAGX achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than FSPSX's 9.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FSAGX has outperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 12.30%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.45% annualized return.


FSAGX

1D
1.18%
1M
3.80%
YTD
5.40%
6M
12.28%
1Y
61.74%
3Y*
40.65%
5Y*
16.56%
10Y*
12.30%

FSPSX

1D
0.41%
1M
4.06%
YTD
9.51%
6M
12.14%
1Y
22.52%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
9.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSAGX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSAGX
Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio
5.40%143.05%14.97%-0.37%-13.46%-10.44%26.83%35.50%-13.00%8.63%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
9.51%31.98%3.70%18.31%-14.23%11.45%8.16%22.03%-13.55%25.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAGX and FSPSX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.32

The correlation between FSAGX and FSPSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSAGX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSAGX
FSAGX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FSAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FSAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPSX
FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSAGX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSAGXFSPSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.45

1.47

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.83

2.10

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.91

+0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.41

7.16

-1.74

FSAGX vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAGX and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSAGXFSPSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

1.47

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.56

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.57

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.50

-0.28

Drawdowns

FSAGX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAGX drawdown since its inception was -77.21%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAGX and FSPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSAGXFSPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.21%

-33.69%

-43.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.85%

-11.39%

-18.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.85%

-13.58%

-16.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.94%

-29.41%

-16.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.57%

-33.69%

-16.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.82%

-0.45%

-22.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.35%

-6.55%

-26.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.40%

3.03%

+8.37%

Volatility

FSAGX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) has a higher volatility of 14.88% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 4.62%. This indicates that FSAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSAGXFSPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.88%

4.62%

+10.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.12%

12.04%

+23.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.06%

14.80%

+28.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.60%

15.98%

+17.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.10%

16.56%

+16.54%

FSAGX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAGX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSAGX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

FSAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than FSPSX's 2.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSAGX
Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio
4.87%2.17%3.62%0.99%0.36%1.60%4.40%0.40%0.00%0.22%3.57%0.00%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
2.88%3.15%3.27%2.79%2.66%3.07%1.84%3.18%2.79%2.50%3.08%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSAGX and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSAGX has higher volatility (14.88%) compared to FSPSX (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAGX dropped -77.21% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

FSPSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSAGX and FSPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer