PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSPSX vs. FSGGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSPSX vs. FSGGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) and Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSPSX achieves a 10.54% return, which is significantly lower than FSGGX's 16.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSPSX having a 9.67% annualized return and FSGGX not far behind at 9.61%.


FSPSX

1D
0.76%
1M
1.93%
YTD
10.54%
6M
11.05%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
9.67%

FSGGX

1D
1.50%
1M
3.53%
YTD
16.18%
6M
17.00%
1Y
34.65%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
9.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSPSX vs. FSGGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
10.54%31.98%3.70%18.31%-14.23%11.45%8.16%22.03%-13.55%25.37%
FSGGX
Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund
16.18%32.93%5.30%15.57%-15.75%7.74%10.73%21.36%-13.93%24.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FSPSX and FSGGX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.97

The correlation between FSPSX and FSGGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSPSX vs. FSGGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSPSX
FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FSGGX
FSGGX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FSGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FSGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSPSX vs. FSGGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) and Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSPSXFSGGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.41

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

3.00

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.05

11.56

-3.50

FSPSX vs. FSGGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSPSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the FSGGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSPSX and FSGGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSPSX vs. FSGGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSPSX drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, roughly equal to the maximum FSGGX drawdown of -34.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSPSX and FSGGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSPSXFSGGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.69%

-34.76%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.39%

-11.26%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.58%

-13.31%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.41%

-29.53%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

-34.76%

+1.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.53%

-7.33%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.92%

+0.12%

Volatility

FSPSX vs. FSGGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) is 4.93%, while Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that FSPSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSGGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSPSXFSGGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

6.57%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.71%

13.57%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.26%

15.57%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

15.56%

+0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.56%

16.25%

+0.31%

FSPSX vs. FSGGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSPSX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FSGGX's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSPSX vs. FSGGX - Dividend Comparison

FSPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than FSGGX's 2.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSGGX
Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund
2.32%2.70%2.91%2.95%2.64%2.60%1.71%2.85%2.66%0.22%0.05%2.44%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
2.85%3.15%3.27%2.79%2.66%3.07%1.84%3.18%2.79%2.50%3.08%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FSPSX and FSGGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSGGX has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to FSPSX (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSPSX dropped -33.69% vs FSGGX's -34.76%.

FSGGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSPSX and FSGGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer