PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSAGX vs. FIJDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSAGX vs. FIJDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FSAGX having a -2.07% return and FIJDX slightly higher at -2.05%.


FSAGX

1D
-0.85%
1M
-3.05%
YTD
-2.07%
6M
-6.88%
1Y
50.39%
3Y*
40.63%
5Y*
16.97%
10Y*
10.62%

FIJDX

1D
-0.85%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
-2.05%
6M
-6.85%
1Y
50.49%
3Y*
40.75%
5Y*
17.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSAGX vs. FIJDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FSAGX
Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio
-2.07%143.05%14.97%-0.37%-13.46%-10.44%26.83%35.50%3.38%
FIJDX
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z
-2.05%143.25%15.10%-0.26%-13.32%-10.33%27.00%35.74%4.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAGX and FIJDX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

1.00

The correlation between FSAGX and FIJDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSAGX vs. FIJDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSAGX
FSAGX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FSAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FSAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FIJDX
FIJDX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FIJDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIJDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIJDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FIJDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIJDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSAGX vs. FIJDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSAGXFIJDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.22

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

1.47

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.95

3.96

-0.01

FSAGX vs. FIJDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the FIJDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAGX and FIJDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSAGX vs. FIJDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAGX drawdown since its inception was -77.21%, which is greater than FIJDX's maximum drawdown of -50.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAGX and FIJDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSAGXFIJDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.21%

-50.43%

-26.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.40%

-35.39%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.40%

-35.39%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.94%

-45.91%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.29%

-28.27%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.34%

-18.53%

-14.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.09%

13.09%

0.00%

Volatility

FSAGX vs. FIJDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX) have volatilities of 17.04% and 17.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSAGXFIJDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.04%

17.03%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.83%

37.82%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.10%

45.08%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.10%

34.08%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.39%

34.63%

-1.24%

FSAGX vs. FIJDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAGX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FIJDX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSAGX vs. FIJDX - Dividend Comparison

FSAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, which matches FIJDX's 5.23% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FIJDX
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z
5.23%2.17%3.63%1.16%0.38%1.71%4.54%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSAGX
Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio
5.24%2.17%3.62%0.99%0.36%1.60%4.40%0.40%0.00%0.22%3.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FSAGX and FIJDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSAGX has higher volatility (17.04%) compared to FIJDX (17.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAGX dropped -77.21% vs FIJDX's -50.43%.

FIJDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSAGX and FIJDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer