PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSAEX vs. VFFSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSAEX vs. VFFSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund (FSAEX) and Vanguard 500 Index Fund Institutional Select Shares (VFFSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAEX achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly higher than VFFSX's 9.79% return.


FSAEX

1D
-0.59%
1M
1.21%
YTD
10.96%
6M
9.78%
1Y
27.21%
3Y*
23.62%
5Y*
14.62%
10Y*
16.98%

VFFSX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.10%
YTD
9.79%
6M
8.79%
1Y
25.51%
3Y*
21.39%
5Y*
13.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSAEX vs. VFFSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSAEX
Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund
10.96%19.80%26.86%30.61%-18.55%26.89%26.23%32.18%-6.56%21.64%
VFFSX
Vanguard 500 Index Fund Institutional Select Shares
9.79%17.87%25.00%26.28%-18.14%29.24%18.35%31.88%-4.42%20.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAEX and VFFSX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.98

The correlation between FSAEX and VFFSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSAEX vs. VFFSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSAEX
FSAEX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FSAEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSAEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSAEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FSAEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSAEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VFFSX
VFFSX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VFFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VFFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSAEX vs. VFFSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund (FSAEX) and Vanguard 500 Index Fund Institutional Select Shares (VFFSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSAEXVFFSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.02

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.84

13.62

-0.79

FSAEX vs. VFFSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the VFFSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAEX and VFFSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSAEX vs. VFFSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAEX drawdown since its inception was -34.55%, roughly equal to the maximum VFFSX drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAEX and VFFSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSAEXVFFSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.55%

-33.82%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-8.90%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.87%

-18.75%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.66%

-24.51%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-1.72%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-4.49%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

1.97%

+0.25%

Volatility

FSAEX vs. VFFSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund (FSAEX) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to Vanguard 500 Index Fund Institutional Select Shares (VFFSX) at 4.67%. This indicates that FSAEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFFSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSAEXVFFSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

4.67%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

9.84%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.47%

12.50%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.99%

16.99%

+1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.86%

18.42%

+0.44%

FSAEX vs. VFFSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAEX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VFFSX's 0.01% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSAEX vs. VFFSX - Dividend Comparison

FSAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, more than VFFSX's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSAEX
Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund
7.55%7.36%8.95%5.50%11.89%20.94%12.13%8.60%41.30%14.60%17.85%9.61%
VFFSX
Vanguard 500 Index Fund Institutional Select Shares
1.05%1.14%1.24%1.46%1.70%1.61%1.56%2.15%2.09%1.81%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FSAEX and VFFSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSAEX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to VFFSX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAEX dropped -34.55% vs VFFSX's -33.82%.

VFFSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSAEX and VFFSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer