FSAEX vs. FCGSX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FSAEX (Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund) and FCGSX (Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund) are both mutual funds - FSAEX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FCGSX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSAEX returned 16.76%/yr vs 24.90%/yr for FCGSX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.00% expense ratio.

Performance

FSAEX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund (FSAEX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAEX achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's 23.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FSAEX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 16.76%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.90% annualized return.

FSAEX

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: 11.62%
• 6M: 10.99%
• 1Y: 29.18%
• 3Y*: 23.34%
• 5Y*: 15.18%
• 10Y*: 16.76%

FCGSX

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: 2.62%
• YTD: 23.73%
• 6M: 22.92%
• 1Y: 56.23%
• 3Y*: 33.30%
• 5Y*: 18.80%
• 10Y*: 24.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSAEX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSAEX Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund	11.62%	19.80%	26.86%	30.61%	-18.55%	26.89%	26.23%	32.18%	-6.56%	21.64%
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	23.73%	25.52%	38.00%	45.97%	-32.15%	25.13%	70.01%	39.75%	-4.03%	37.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAEX and FCGSX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2013	0.90

The correlation between FSAEX and FCGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSAEX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSAEX

FSAEX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FSAEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FSAEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FSAEX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FSAEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
FSAEX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

FCGSX

FCGSX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FCGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FCGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FCGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FCGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FCGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSAEX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund (FSAEX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSAEX	FCGSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	2.95	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	3.66	-0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.49	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	5.34	-2.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.06	23.29	-10.22

FSAEX vs. FCGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the FCGSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAEX and FCGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSAEX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAEX drawdown since its inception was -34.55%, smaller than the maximum FCGSX drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAEX and FCGSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSAEX	FCGSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.55%	-38.77%	+4.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.83%	-10.42%	+0.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.87%	-26.07%	+6.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.66%	-38.77%	+14.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.55%	-38.77%	+4.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	-0.62%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.55%	-6.95%	+2.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	2.38%	-0.16%

Volatility

FSAEX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund (FSAEX) is 5.31%, while Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) has a volatility of 7.55%. This indicates that FSAEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSAEX	FCGSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.31%	7.55%	-2.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.72%	14.82%	-4.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.43%	18.83%	-5.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.99%	23.83%	-5.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.85%	23.33%	-4.48%

FSAEX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAEX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FSAEX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison

FSAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.50%, less than FCGSX's 8.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	8.47%	10.48%	12.49%	3.13%	0.61%	38.65%	31.99%	11.06%	13.21%	10.51%	2.44%	0.25%
FSAEX Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund	7.50%	7.36%	8.95%	5.50%	11.89%	20.94%	12.13%	8.60%	41.30%	14.60%	17.85%	9.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSAEX and FCGSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FSAEX and FCGSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FSAEX or FCGSX?

FCGSX has higher volatility (7.55%) compared to FSAEX (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAEX dropped -34.55% vs FCGSX's -38.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.