FSAEX vs. FITFX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FSAEX (Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund) and FITFX (Fidelity Flex International Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FSAEX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FITFX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FSAEX returned 14.62%/yr vs 9.44%/yr for FITFX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.00% expense ratio.

Performance

FSAEX vs. FITFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund (FSAEX) and Fidelity Flex International Index Fund (FITFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAEX achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly lower than FITFX's 16.48% return.

FSAEX

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 1.21%
• YTD: 10.96%
• 6M: 9.78%
• 1Y: 27.21%
• 3Y*: 23.62%
• 5Y*: 14.62%
• 10Y*: 16.98%

FITFX

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 3.39%
• YTD: 16.48%
• 6M: 16.55%
• 1Y: 34.39%
• 3Y*: 20.48%
• 5Y*: 9.44%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSAEX vs. FITFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSAEX Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund	10.96%	19.80%	26.86%	30.61%	-18.55%	26.89%	26.23%	32.18%	-6.56%	14.22%
FITFX Fidelity Flex International Index Fund	16.48%	33.21%	5.37%	15.45%	-15.72%	7.76%	10.77%	21.44%	-13.97%	21.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAEX and FITFX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017	0.77

The correlation between FSAEX and FITFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSAEX vs. FITFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSAEX

FSAEX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FSAEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FSAEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FSAEX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FSAEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FSAEX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

FITFX

FITFX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FITFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FITFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FITFX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FITFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FITFX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSAEX vs. FITFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund (FSAEX) and Fidelity Flex International Index Fund (FITFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSAEX	FITFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	2.28	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	3.06	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.43	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	3.17	-0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.84	12.19	+0.65

FSAEX vs. FITFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the FITFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAEX and FITFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSAEX vs. FITFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAEX drawdown since its inception was -34.55%, roughly equal to the maximum FITFX drawdown of -34.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAEX and FITFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSAEX	FITFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.55%	-34.84%	+0.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.83%	-11.22%	+1.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.87%	-13.35%	-6.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.66%	-29.54%	+4.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.76%	0.00%	-1.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.55%	-7.40%	+2.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	2.91%	-0.69%

Volatility

FSAEX vs. FITFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund (FSAEX) is 5.24%, while Fidelity Flex International Index Fund (FITFX) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that FSAEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FITFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSAEX	FITFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.24%	6.32%	-1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.66%	13.49%	-2.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.47%	15.63%	-2.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.99%	15.57%	+2.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.86%	16.40%	+2.46%

FSAEX vs. FITFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAEX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FITFX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FSAEX vs. FITFX - Dividend Comparison

FSAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, more than FITFX's 2.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FITFX Fidelity Flex International Index Fund	2.48%	2.88%	2.77%	2.67%	2.60%	2.25%	1.50%	2.54%	1.92%	1.70%	0.00%	0.00%
FSAEX Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund	7.55%	7.36%	8.95%	5.50%	11.89%	20.94%	12.13%	8.60%	41.30%	14.60%	17.85%	9.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSAEX and FITFX in my portfolio?

FSAEX and FITFX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSAEX or FITFX?

FITFX has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to FSAEX (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAEX dropped -34.55% vs FITFX's -34.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FITFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.