PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSAEX vs. FITFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSAEX vs. FITFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund (FSAEX) and Fidelity Flex International Index Fund (FITFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAEX achieves a 11.40% return, which is significantly lower than FITFX's 14.09% return.


FSAEX

1D
2.30%
1M
-0.26%
6M
10.61%
YTD
11.40%
1Y
22.29%
3Y*
21.47%
5Y*
14.09%
10Y*
16.25%
ALL TIME*
14.33%

FITFX

1D
2.91%
1M
0.42%
6M
7.84%
YTD
14.09%
1Y
29.64%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSAEX vs. FITFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSAEX
Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund
11.40%19.80%26.86%30.61%-18.55%26.89%26.23%32.18%-6.56%14.22%
FITFX
Fidelity Flex International Index Fund
14.09%33.21%5.37%15.45%-15.72%7.76%10.77%21.44%-13.97%21.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAEX and FITFX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017

0.77

The correlation between FSAEX and FITFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSAEX vs. FITFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSAEX
FSAEX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FSAEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSAEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSAEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FSAEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSAEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FITFX
FITFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FITFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FITFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FITFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FITFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FITFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSAEX vs. FITFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund (FSAEX) and Fidelity Flex International Index Fund (FITFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSAEXFITFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.53

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.73

9.40

-0.68

FSAEX vs. FITFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the FITFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAEX and FITFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSAEX vs. FITFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAEX drawdown since its inception was -34.55%, roughly equal to the maximum FITFX drawdown of -34.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAEX and FITFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSAEXFITFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.55%

-34.84%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-11.22%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.87%

-13.35%

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.66%

-29.54%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-2.05%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.53%

-7.35%

+2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

3.01%

-0.71%

Volatility

FSAEX vs. FITFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund (FSAEX) is 3.85%, while Fidelity Flex International Index Fund (FITFX) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that FSAEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FITFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSAEXFITFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

5.44%

-1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.03%

14.47%

-3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.86%

16.43%

-2.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.00%

15.71%

+2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.81%

16.43%

+2.38%

FSAEX vs. FITFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAEX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FITFX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSAEX vs. FITFX - Dividend Comparison

FSAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.52%, more than FITFX's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FITFX
Fidelity Flex International Index Fund
2.53%2.88%2.77%2.67%2.60%2.25%1.50%2.54%1.92%1.70%0.00%0.00%
FSAEX
Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund
7.52%7.36%8.95%5.50%11.89%20.94%12.13%8.60%41.30%14.60%17.85%9.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSAEX and FITFX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FITFX has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to FSAEX (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAEX dropped -34.55% vs FITFX's -34.84%.

FITFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSAEX and FITFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer