FSAEX vs. MSFT
FSAEX (Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FSAEX returned 16.55%/yr vs 23.47%/yr for MSFT. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FSAEX vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSAEX achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -18.79% return. Over the past 10 years, FSAEX has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 16.55%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 23.47% annualized return.
FSAEX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- YTD
- 13.17%
- 1Y
- 24.42%
- 3Y*
- 23.47%
- 5Y*
- 14.50%
- 10Y*
- 16.55%
MSFT
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- 6M
- -17.70%
- YTD
- -18.79%
- 1Y
- -21.70%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.60%
- 10Y*
- 23.47%
FSAEX vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSAEX Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund | 13.17% | 19.80% | 26.86% | 30.61% | -18.55% | 26.89% | 26.23% | 32.18% | -6.56% | 21.64% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -18.79% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSAEX and MSFT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2008 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FSAEX and MSFT has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSAEX vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
FSAEX
MSFT
FSAEX vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund (FSAEX) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSAEX | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.87 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | -0.63 | +3.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.66 | -1.18 | +11.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSAEX vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSAEX drawdown since its inception was -34.55%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAEX and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSAEX | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.55% | -69.38% | +34.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.83% | -34.50% | +24.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.87% | -34.50% | +14.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.66% | -37.15% | +12.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.55% | -37.15% | +2.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -27.41% | +27.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -21.80% | +17.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 18.36% | -16.10% |
Volatility
FSAEX vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund (FSAEX) is 4.67%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 10.62%. This indicates that FSAEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSAEX | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 10.62% | -5.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.75% | 24.24% | -13.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.46% | 27.18% | -13.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 27.01% | -9.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.78% | 27.17% | -8.39% |
Dividends
FSAEX vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
FSAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.40%, more than MSFT's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSAEX Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund | 7.40% | 7.36% | 8.95% | 5.50% | 11.89% | 20.94% | 12.13% | 8.60% | 41.30% | 14.60% | 17.85% | 9.61% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.91% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSAEX and MSFT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFT has higher volatility (10.62%) compared to FSAEX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAEX dropped -34.55% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
FSAEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSAEX and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer