PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSAEX vs. FLCNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSAEX vs. FLCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund (FSAEX) and Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAEX achieves a 12.66% return, which is significantly higher than FLCNX's 6.67% return.


FSAEX

1D
1.13%
1M
0.86%
6M
11.38%
YTD
12.66%
1Y
23.66%
3Y*
22.04%
5Y*
14.34%
10Y*
16.46%
ALL TIME*
14.40%

FLCNX

1D
1.28%
1M
-1.95%
6M
4.58%
YTD
6.67%
1Y
14.53%
3Y*
23.48%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSAEX vs. FLCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSAEX
Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund
12.66%19.80%26.86%30.61%-18.55%26.89%26.23%32.18%-6.56%10.40%
FLCNX
Fidelity Contrafund K6
6.67%22.05%35.37%37.67%-27.13%24.21%30.85%30.91%-2.16%13.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAEX and FLCNX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017

0.93

The correlation between FSAEX and FLCNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSAEX vs. FLCNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSAEX
FSAEX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FSAEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSAEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSAEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FSAEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSAEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCNX
FLCNX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FLCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSAEX vs. FLCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund (FSAEX) and Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSAEXFLCNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.15

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

1.05

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.40

4.10

+5.31

FSAEX vs. FLCNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the FLCNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAEX and FLCNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSAEX vs. FLCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAEX drawdown since its inception was -34.55%, which is greater than FLCNX's maximum drawdown of -32.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAEX and FLCNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSAEXFLCNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.55%

-32.07%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-11.73%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.87%

-20.14%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.66%

-32.07%

+7.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-3.23%

+2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.53%

-6.57%

+2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

3.00%

-0.70%

Volatility

FSAEX vs. FLCNX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund (FSAEX) and Fidelity Contrafund K6 (FLCNX) have volatilities of 4.01% and 4.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSAEXFLCNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

4.05%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.08%

12.28%

-1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.90%

15.63%

-1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.00%

19.27%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.81%

20.38%

-1.57%

FSAEX vs. FLCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAEX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCNX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSAEX vs. FLCNX - Dividend Comparison

FSAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, less than FLCNX's 10.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCNX
Fidelity Contrafund K6
10.76%8.35%0.36%0.49%1.18%0.46%0.21%0.30%0.33%0.15%0.00%0.00%
FSAEX
Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund
7.43%7.36%8.95%5.50%11.89%20.94%12.13%8.60%41.30%14.60%17.85%9.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FSAEX and FLCNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLCNX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to FSAEX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAEX dropped -34.55% vs FLCNX's -32.07%.

FSAEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSAEX and FLCNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer