PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSAEX vs. TANDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSAEX vs. TANDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund (FSAEX) and Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAEX achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly higher than TANDX's -13.98% return.


FSAEX

1D
-0.59%
1M
1.21%
YTD
10.96%
6M
9.78%
1Y
27.21%
3Y*
23.62%
5Y*
14.62%
10Y*
16.98%

TANDX

1D
-0.79%
1M
-2.77%
YTD
-13.98%
6M
-14.52%
1Y
-15.47%
3Y*
0.56%
5Y*
1.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSAEX vs. TANDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FSAEX
Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund
10.96%19.80%26.86%30.61%-18.55%26.89%26.23%14.80%
TANDX
Castle Tandem Fund
-13.98%3.67%7.66%8.42%-7.87%19.03%13.39%12.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAEX and TANDX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between FSAEX and TANDX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSAEX vs. TANDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSAEX
FSAEX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FSAEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSAEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSAEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FSAEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSAEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

TANDX
TANDX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
TANDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TANDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
TANDX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
TANDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
TANDX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSAEX vs. TANDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund (FSAEX) and Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSAEXTANDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.77

+0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

-0.88

+3.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.84

-1.91

+14.75

FSAEX vs. TANDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the TANDX Sharpe Ratio of -1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAEX and TANDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSAEX vs. TANDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAEX drawdown since its inception was -34.55%, smaller than the maximum TANDX drawdown of -93.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAEX and TANDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSAEXTANDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.55%

-93.98%

+59.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-16.90%

+7.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.87%

-93.98%

+74.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.66%

-93.98%

+69.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-93.98%

+92.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-20.77%

+16.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

7.72%

-5.50%

Volatility

FSAEX vs. TANDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund (FSAEX) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX) at 3.23%. This indicates that FSAEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TANDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSAEXTANDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

3.23%

+2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

7.55%

+3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.47%

9.62%

+3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.99%

596.04%

-578.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.86%

494.77%

-475.91%

FSAEX vs. TANDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAEX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than TANDX's 1.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSAEX vs. TANDX - Dividend Comparison

FSAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, more than TANDX's 7.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSAEX
Fidelity Series All-Sector Equity Fund
7.55%7.36%8.95%5.50%11.89%20.94%12.13%8.60%41.30%14.60%17.85%9.61%
TANDX
Castle Tandem Fund
7.17%6.17%3.71%2.10%1.48%4.57%0.33%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSAEX and TANDX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSAEX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to TANDX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAEX dropped -34.55% vs TANDX's -93.98%.

FSAEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSAEX and TANDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer