PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRU.TO vs. ARCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FRU.TO vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU.TO) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FRU.TO is traded in CAD, while ARCC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ARCC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRU.TO achieves a 18.31% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's -3.93% return. Over the past 10 years, FRU.TO has underperformed ARCC with an annualized return of 11.21%, while ARCC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.38% annualized return.


FRU.TO

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
18.31%
6M
19.71%
1Y
50.63%
3Y*
15.21%
5Y*
21.74%
10Y*
11.21%

ARCC

1D
-1.12%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
-3.93%
6M
-6.02%
1Y
-5.37%
3Y*
10.34%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
13.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRU.TO vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRU.TO
Freehold Royalties Ltd.
18.31%28.81%0.98%-6.86%45.15%135.56%-23.25%-4.51%-37.74%3.37%
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
-3.93%-3.57%30.07%17.39%3.01%34.90%-0.84%24.84%18.04%-2.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FRU.TO and ARCC is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009

0.15

The correlation between FRU.TO and ARCC shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FRU.TO:

CA$2.87B

ARCC:

$13.41B

EPS

FRU.TO:

CA$0.55

ARCC:

$1.63

PE Ratio

FRU.TO:

32.08

ARCC:

11.46

PEG Ratio

FRU.TO:

1.36

ARCC:

1.72

PS Ratio

FRU.TO:

9.57

ARCC:

5.01

PB Ratio

FRU.TO:

2.88

ARCC:

0.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

FRU.TO:

CA$300.21M

ARCC:

$2.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FRU.TO:

CA$185.62M

ARCC:

$1.86B

EBITDA (TTM)

FRU.TO:

CA$242.63M

ARCC:

$2.05B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRU.TO vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRU.TO
FRU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FRU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FRU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

ARCC
ARCC Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ARCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARCC Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ARCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARCC Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRU.TO vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU.TO) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRU.TOARCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

0.97

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.24

-0.28

+7.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.15

-0.53

+22.67

FRU.TO vs. ARCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the ARCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRU.TO and ARCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRU.TOARCCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

-0.29

+2.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.63

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.55

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.73

-0.34

Drawdowns

FRU.TO vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRU.TO drawdown since its inception was -86.93%, which is greater than ARCC's maximum drawdown of -52.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRU.TO and ARCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRU.TOARCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.93%

-52.90%

-34.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.03%

-19.37%

+12.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.21%

-21.60%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.41%

-21.60%

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.39%

-52.90%

-28.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.15%

-15.16%

+13.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.68%

-5.22%

-17.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

10.22%

-7.92%

Volatility

FRU.TO vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison

Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 3.61%. This indicates that FRU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRU.TOARCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

3.61%

+2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.38%

14.70%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.00%

18.40%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.31%

18.67%

+10.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.32%

24.27%

+11.05%

Dividends

FRU.TO vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison

FRU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, less than ARCC's 10.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
10.28%9.49%8.77%9.59%10.12%7.65%9.47%9.01%9.88%9.67%9.22%11.02%
FRU.TO
Freehold Royalties Ltd.
6.17%7.11%8.44%7.89%6.13%4.21%5.74%8.72%7.62%4.13%3.81%9.21%

Financials

FRU.TO vs. ARCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Freehold Royalties Ltd. and Ares Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
77.82M
763.00M
(FRU.TO) Total Revenue
(ARCC) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FRU.TO values in CAD, ARCC values in USD

FRU.TO vs. ARCC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Freehold Royalties Ltd. and Ares Capital Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
68.1%
72.1%
Portfolio components
FRU.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freehold Royalties Ltd. reported a gross profit of 52.96M and revenue of 77.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.1%.

ARCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 550.00M and revenue of 763.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.

FRU.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freehold Royalties Ltd. reported an operating income of 40.33M and revenue of 77.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.8%.

ARCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 404.00M and revenue of 763.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.0%.

FRU.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freehold Royalties Ltd. reported a net income of 35.11M and revenue of 77.82M, resulting in a net margin of 45.1%.

ARCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported a net income of 92.00M and revenue of 763.00M, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FRU.TO and ARCC have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRU.TO and ARCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer