FRU.TO vs. ARCC
Compare and contrast key facts about Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU.TO) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).
Performance
FRU.TO vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRU.TO vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRU.TO Freehold Royalties Ltd. | 15.56% | 28.81% | 0.98% | -6.86% | 45.15% | 135.56% | -23.25% | -4.51% | -37.74% | 3.37% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | -7.26% | -3.57% | 30.07% | 17.39% | 3.01% | 34.90% | -0.84% | 24.84% | 18.04% | -2.16% |
Different Trading Currencies
FRU.TO is traded in CAD, while ARCC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ARCC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
FRU.TO:
CA$2.85B
ARCC:
$12.60B
FRU.TO:
CA$0.56
ARCC:
$1.64
FRU.TO:
31.07
ARCC:
11.00
FRU.TO:
1.31
ARCC:
1.65
FRU.TO:
9.10
ARCC:
6.71
FRU.TO:
2.85
ARCC:
0.88
FRU.TO:
CA$313.46M
ARCC:
$1.88B
FRU.TO:
CA$193.18M
ARCC:
$1.18B
FRU.TO:
CA$258.03M
ARCC:
$1.08B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRU.TO achieves a 15.56% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's -7.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FRU.TO having a 12.33% annualized return and ARCC not far ahead at 12.67%.
FRU.TO
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- 15.56%
- 6M
- 29.74%
- 1Y
- 46.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 26.83%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
ARCC
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- -7.26%
- 6M
- -7.25%
- 1Y
- -13.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.40%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRU.TO vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank
FRU.TO
ARCC
FRU.TO vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU.TO) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRU.TO | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | -0.59 | +2.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.32 | -0.71 | +3.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 0.91 | +0.46 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | -0.67 | +3.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.65 | -1.38 | +13.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRU.TO | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | -0.59 | +2.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.59 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.52 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.80 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRU.TO and ARCC is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FRU.TO vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison
FRU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, less than ARCC's 10.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRU.TO Freehold Royalties Ltd. | 5.70% | 7.11% | 8.44% | 7.89% | 6.13% | 4.21% | 5.74% | 8.72% | 7.62% | 4.13% | 3.81% | 9.21% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 10.65% | 9.49% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% |
Drawdowns
FRU.TO vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRU.TO drawdown since its inception was -86.93%, which is greater than ARCC's maximum drawdown of -52.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRU.TO and ARCC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRU.TO | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.93% | -79.36% | -7.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.89% | -19.35% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.41% | -21.76% | -6.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.39% | -56.77% | -24.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -16.71% | +13.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.80% | -9.07% | -13.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 9.33% | -5.38% |
Volatility
FRU.TO vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison
Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU.TO) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) have volatilities of 6.68% and 6.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRU.TO | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.68% | 6.77% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.16% | 15.12% | -0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.37% | 23.16% | +1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.60% | 18.62% | +10.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.64% | 24.23% | +11.41% |
Financials
FRU.TO vs. ARCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Freehold Royalties Ltd. and Ares Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FRU.TO vs. ARCC - Profitability Comparison
FRU.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Freehold Royalties Ltd. reported a gross profit of 39.81M and revenue of 69.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.1%.
ARCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 43.48M and revenue of 202.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.5%.
FRU.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Freehold Royalties Ltd. reported an operating income of 30.80M and revenue of 69.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 44.2%.
ARCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 26.85M and revenue of 202.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.3%.
FRU.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Freehold Royalties Ltd. reported a net income of 14.08M and revenue of 69.76M, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.
ARCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported a net income of 142.36M and revenue of 202.00M, resulting in a net margin of 70.5%.