FRU.TO vs. ATD.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU.TO) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO).
Performance
FRU.TO vs. ATD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRU.TO vs. ATD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRU.TO Freehold Royalties Ltd. | 15.56% | 28.81% | 0.98% | -6.86% | 45.15% | 135.56% | -23.25% | -4.51% | -37.74% | 3.37% |
ATD.TO Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 5.48% | -4.91% | 3.11% | 32.26% | 13.21% | 22.84% | 5.88% | 22.54% | 3.57% | 6.48% |
Fundamentals
FRU.TO:
CA$2.85B
ATD.TO:
CA$72.90B
FRU.TO:
CA$0.56
ATD.TO:
CA$2.89
FRU.TO:
31.07
ATD.TO:
27.32
FRU.TO:
1.31
ATD.TO:
8.46
FRU.TO:
9.10
ATD.TO:
1.01
FRU.TO:
2.85
ATD.TO:
4.68
FRU.TO:
CA$313.46M
ATD.TO:
CA$73.29B
FRU.TO:
CA$193.18M
ATD.TO:
CA$13.89B
FRU.TO:
CA$258.03M
ATD.TO:
CA$6.26B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRU.TO achieves a 15.56% return, which is significantly higher than ATD.TO's 5.48% return. Over the past 10 years, FRU.TO has outperformed ATD.TO with an annualized return of 12.33%, while ATD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.17% annualized return.
FRU.TO
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- 15.56%
- 6M
- 29.74%
- 1Y
- 46.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 26.83%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
ATD.TO
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -4.49%
- YTD
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 6.79%
- 1Y
- 12.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.12%
- 5Y*
- 14.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRU.TO vs. ATD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FRU.TO
ATD.TO
FRU.TO vs. ATD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU.TO) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRU.TO | ATD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | 0.48 | +1.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.32 | 0.94 | +1.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.11 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 1.34 | +1.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.65 | 2.68 | +8.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRU.TO | ATD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 0.48 | +1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.64 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.46 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | -0.00 | +0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRU.TO and ATD.TO is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FRU.TO vs. ATD.TO - Dividend Comparison
FRU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, more than ATD.TO's 1.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRU.TO Freehold Royalties Ltd. | 5.70% | 7.11% | 8.44% | 7.89% | 6.13% | 4.21% | 5.74% | 8.72% | 7.62% | 4.13% | 3.81% | 9.21% |
ATD.TO Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 1.04% | 1.07% | 0.90% | 0.76% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.69% | 0.61% | 0.57% | 0.55% | 0.50% | 0.27% |
Drawdowns
FRU.TO vs. ATD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRU.TO drawdown since its inception was -86.93%, smaller than the maximum ATD.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRU.TO and ATD.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRU.TO | ATD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.93% | -100.00% | +13.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.89% | -10.66% | -5.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.41% | -22.16% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.39% | -32.61% | -48.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -99.89% | +96.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.80% | -79.30% | +56.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 5.32% | -1.37% |
Volatility
FRU.TO vs. ATD.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU.TO) is 6.68%, while Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) has a volatility of 9.42%. This indicates that FRU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRU.TO | ATD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.68% | 9.42% | -2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.16% | 18.28% | -4.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.37% | 25.97% | -1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.60% | 23.43% | +6.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.64% | 24.49% | +11.15% |
Financials
FRU.TO vs. ATD.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Freehold Royalties Ltd. and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FRU.TO vs. ATD.TO - Profitability Comparison
FRU.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Freehold Royalties Ltd. reported a gross profit of 39.81M and revenue of 69.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.1%.
ATD.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.24B and revenue of 21.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.
FRU.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Freehold Royalties Ltd. reported an operating income of 30.80M and revenue of 69.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 44.2%.
ATD.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported an operating income of 1.15B and revenue of 21.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.
FRU.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Freehold Royalties Ltd. reported a net income of 14.08M and revenue of 69.76M, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.
ATD.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported a net income of 757.20M and revenue of 21.81B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.