FRT vs. MMM
FRT (Federal Realty Investment Trust) and MMM (3M Company) are both stocks. FRT operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate), while MMM operates in Conglomerates (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, FRT returned 0.86%/yr vs 5.05%/yr for MMM. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FRT vs. MMM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRT achieves a 27.00% return, which is significantly higher than MMM's 11.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FRT has underperformed MMM with an annualized return of 0.86%, while MMM has yielded a comparatively higher 5.05% annualized return.
FRT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- 6M
- 25.13%
- YTD
- 27.00%
- 1Y
- 40.48%
- 3Y*
- 11.69%
- 5Y*
- 5.42%
- 10Y*
- 0.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.98%
MMM
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 10.20%
- 6M
- 16.21%
- YTD
- 11.17%
- 1Y
- 20.34%
- 3Y*
- 27.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.95%
- 10Y*
- 5.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $114.71M | $100.27M | $112.02M | |
MMM 3M Company | $851.12M | $623.50M | $620.01M |
FRT vs. MMM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRT Federal Realty Investment Trust | 27.00% | -5.91% | 12.07% | 6.55% | -22.66% | 65.97% | -30.66% | 12.51% | -8.10% | -3.59% |
MMM 3M Company | 11.17% | 26.36% | 46.13% | -3.33% | -29.63% | 4.85% | 2.77% | -4.29% | -16.90% | 34.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRT and MMM is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 1973 | 0.25 |
The correlation between FRT and MMM shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FRT:
$10.72B
MMM:
$90.91B
FRT:
$5.06
MMM:
$5.60
FRT:
24.52
MMM:
31.49
FRT:
8.01
MMM:
3.75
FRT:
3.18
MMM:
31.51
FRT:
$1.34B
MMM:
$25.18B
FRT:
$721.93M
MMM:
$9.92B
FRT:
$1.03B
MMM:
$5.45B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRT vs. MMM — Risk / Return Rank
FRT
MMM
FRT vs. MMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and 3M Company (MMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FRT | MMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.15 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.84 | 1.09 | +4.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.32 | 2.35 | +12.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FRT vs. MMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRT drawdown since its inception was -57.42%, roughly equal to the maximum MMM drawdown of -59.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRT and MMM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRT | MMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.42% | -59.10% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.96% | -18.77% | +11.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.38% | -20.66% | -6.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.99% | -53.23% | +18.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.49% | -59.10% | +3.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -3.40% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.75% | -16.08% | +4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 8.68% | -6.03% |
Volatility
FRT vs. MMM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) is 4.22%, while 3M Company (MMM) has a volatility of 9.67%. This indicates that FRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRT | MMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 9.67% | -5.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.28% | 19.73% | -7.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.08% | 26.96% | -9.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 28.62% | -5.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.46% | 26.71% | +2.75% |
Dividends
FRT vs. MMM - Dividend Comparison
FRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than MMM's 1.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRT Federal Realty Investment Trust | 3.64% | 4.39% | 2.93% | 4.21% | 4.26% | 3.12% | 4.96% | 3.22% | 3.42% | 2.98% | 2.70% | 2.48% |
MMM 3M Company | 1.71% | 1.82% | 16.27% | 5.49% | 4.97% | 3.33% | 3.36% | 3.26% | 2.86% | 2.00% | 2.49% | 2.72% |
Financials
FRT vs. MMM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Realty Investment Trust and 3M Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FRT vs. MMM - Profitability Comparison
FRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 232.14M and revenue of 335.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.2%.
MMM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, 3M Company reported a gross profit of 2.68B and revenue of 6.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.3%.
FRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported an operating income of 138.66M and revenue of 335.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 41.3%.
MMM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, 3M Company reported an operating income of 984.00M and revenue of 6.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.
FRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported a net income of 85.70M and revenue of 335.71M, resulting in a net margin of 25.5%.
MMM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, 3M Company reported a net income of 933.00M and revenue of 6.50B, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FRT and MMM have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMM has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to FRT (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRT dropped -57.42% vs MMM's -59.10%.
FRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRT and MMM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer