FRO vs. UGA
FRO (Frontline Ltd.) is a stock, while UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) is Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Over the past 10 years, FRO returned 22.50%/yr vs 14.43%/yr for UGA. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FRO vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRO achieves a 62.94% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 75.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FRO has outperformed UGA with an annualized return of 22.50%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively lower 14.43% annualized return.
FRO
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -7.02%
- YTD
- 62.94%
- 6M
- 51.91%
- 1Y
- 106.10%
- 3Y*
- 45.60%
- 5Y*
- 42.39%
- 10Y*
- 22.50%
UGA
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -12.35%
- YTD
- 75.49%
- 6M
- 64.35%
- 1Y
- 80.94%
- 3Y*
- 22.21%
- 5Y*
- 25.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.43%
FRO vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRO Frontline Ltd. | 62.94% | 61.17% | -22.48% | 96.23% | 73.67% | 13.67% | -41.47% | 134.59% | 20.48% | -32.17% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 75.49% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRO and UGA is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2008 | 0.25 |
The correlation between FRO and UGA shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRO vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
FRO
UGA
FRO vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontline Ltd. (FRO) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRO | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.37 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.98 | 5.47 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.64 | 13.25 | +0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRO | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 2.32 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.73 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.39 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.12 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
FRO vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRO drawdown since its inception was -98.36%, which is greater than UGA's maximum drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRO and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRO | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.36% | -86.59% | -11.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.41% | -14.88% | -6.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.04% | -26.68% | -25.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.04% | -38.11% | -13.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.14% | -75.89% | +18.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.62% | -12.35% | -62.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.84% | -36.76% | -31.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.80% | 6.13% | +1.67% |
Volatility
FRO vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Frontline Ltd. (FRO) is 10.53%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.66%. This indicates that FRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRO | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.53% | 11.66% | -1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.64% | 30.41% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.97% | 35.14% | +6.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.34% | 34.38% | +14.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.16% | 37.27% | +13.89% |
Dividends
FRO vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
FRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRO Frontline Ltd. | 5.11% | 4.26% | 13.74% | 14.31% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 25.72% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 6.54% | 19.83% | 1.67% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRO and UGA have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (11.66%) compared to FRO (10.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRO dropped -98.36% vs UGA's -86.59%.
FRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRO and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer