PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRO vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRO vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontline Ltd. (FRO) and United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRO achieves a 96.93% return, which is significantly higher than UGA's 80.98% return. Over the past 10 years, FRO has outperformed UGA with an annualized return of 25.86%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively lower 16.82% annualized return.


FRO

1D
1.37%
1M
8.60%
6M
50.45%
YTD
96.93%
1Y
134.13%
3Y*
45.08%
5Y*
50.85%
10Y*
25.86%
ALL TIME*
7.10%

UGA

1D
-5.27%
1M
8.52%
6M
69.92%
YTD
80.98%
1Y
78.20%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
25.31%
10Y*
16.82%
ALL TIME*
4.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$69.48M$78.00M$108.04M
$8.16M$5.91M$4.98M

FRO vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRO
Frontline Ltd.
96.93%61.17%-22.48%96.23%73.67%13.67%-41.47%134.59%20.48%-32.17%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund, LP
80.98%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%-24.88%41.25%-28.07%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FRO and UGA is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2008

0.25

The correlation between FRO and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRO vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FRO
FRO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FRO vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontline Ltd. (FRO) and United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FROUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.35

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.30

3.87

+2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.99

10.83

+5.16

FRO vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRO Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is higher than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRO and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRO vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRO drawdown since its inception was -98.36%, which is greater than UGA's maximum drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRO and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FROUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.36%

-86.59%

-11.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.41%

-20.32%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.04%

-26.68%

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.04%

-38.11%

-13.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.04%

-75.89%

+23.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.33%

-10.61%

-58.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.85%

-36.53%

-31.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.42%

7.25%

+1.17%

Volatility

FRO vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frontline Ltd. (FRO) is 11.03%, while United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA) has a volatility of 12.68%. This indicates that FRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FROUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.03%

12.68%

-1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.27%

32.51%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.32%

36.42%

+6.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.78%

34.68%

+15.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.17%

37.30%

+13.87%

Dividends

FRO vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

FRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.84%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRO
Frontline Ltd.
7.84%4.26%13.74%14.31%1.24%0.00%25.72%0.78%0.00%6.54%19.83%1.67%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund, LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRO and UGA have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to FRO (11.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRO dropped -98.36% vs UGA's -86.59%.

FRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRO and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer