PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRO vs. SDCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRO vs. SDCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontline Ltd. (FRO) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRO achieves a 82.17% return, which is significantly higher than SDCI's 27.24% return.


FRO

1D
-3.17%
1M
-5.50%
6M
57.93%
YTD
82.17%
1Y
113.41%
3Y*
47.23%
5Y*
45.74%
10Y*
25.02%

SDCI

1D
2.45%
1M
3.24%
6M
22.83%
YTD
27.24%
1Y
31.47%
3Y*
21.11%
5Y*
20.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRO vs. SDCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FRO
Frontline Ltd.
82.17%61.17%-22.48%96.23%73.67%13.67%-41.47%134.59%28.31%
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
27.24%17.60%17.91%-0.88%33.23%36.52%-10.61%-2.36%-13.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FRO and SDCI is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2018

0.24

The correlation between FRO and SDCI shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRO vs. SDCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRO
FRO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

SDCI
SDCI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SDCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SDCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDCI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRO vs. SDCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontline Ltd. (FRO) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FROSDCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.31

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.33

2.87

+2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.19

9.00

+5.19

FRO vs. SDCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the SDCI Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRO and SDCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRO vs. SDCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRO drawdown since its inception was -98.36%, which is greater than SDCI's maximum drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRO and SDCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FROSDCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.36%

-45.79%

-52.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.41%

-11.03%

-10.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.04%

-11.96%

-40.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.04%

-18.55%

-33.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.63%

-4.30%

-67.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.85%

-11.53%

-56.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.05%

3.51%

+4.54%

Volatility

FRO vs. SDCI - Volatility Comparison

Frontline Ltd. (FRO) has a higher volatility of 19.31% compared to USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) at 5.40%. This indicates that FRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FROSDCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.31%

5.40%

+13.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.43%

14.76%

+18.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.31%

17.17%

+26.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.83%

18.43%

+31.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.18%

17.09%

+34.09%

Dividends

FRO vs. SDCI - Dividend Comparison

FRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.48%, more than SDCI's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRO
Frontline Ltd.
8.48%4.26%13.74%14.31%1.24%0.00%25.72%0.78%0.00%6.54%19.83%1.67%
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
2.89%3.68%5.92%3.46%33.49%19.26%0.20%0.93%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRO and SDCI have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRO has higher volatility (19.31%) compared to SDCI (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRO dropped -98.36% vs SDCI's -45.79%.

FRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRO and SDCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer