FRNRX vs. FMAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Natural Resources Fund (FRNRX) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT).
FRNRX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 4, 1995. FMAT is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Materials Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013.
Performance
FRNRX vs. FMAT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRNRX vs. FMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRNRX Franklin Natural Resources Fund | 22.80% | 30.43% | 1.28% | 3.25% | 30.52% | 74.38% | -21.58% | 10.03% | -23.78% | 0.32% |
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF | 10.39% | 12.11% | 0.47% | 13.71% | -11.54% | 27.45% | 19.57% | 23.35% | -17.40% | 23.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRNRX achieves a 22.80% return, which is significantly higher than FMAT's 10.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FRNRX has outperformed FMAT with an annualized return of 12.31%, while FMAT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.68% annualized return.
FRNRX
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 22.80%
- 6M
- 31.62%
- 1Y
- 50.36%
- 3Y*
- 19.66%
- 5Y*
- 25.93%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
FMAT
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -6.01%
- YTD
- 10.39%
- 6M
- 13.11%
- 1Y
- 22.42%
- 3Y*
- 10.45%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 10.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRNRX vs. FMAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRNRX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FMAT's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRNRX vs. FMAT — Risk / Return Rank
FRNRX
FMAT
FRNRX vs. FMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Natural Resources Fund (FRNRX) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRNRX | FMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.45 | 1.05 | +1.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.02 | 1.59 | +1.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.20 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 1.61 | +1.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.67 | 5.50 | +9.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRNRX | FMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 1.05 | +1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 0.38 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.51 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.44 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRNRX and FMAT is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FRNRX vs. FMAT - Dividend Comparison
FRNRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than FMAT's 1.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRNRX Franklin Natural Resources Fund | 1.38% | 1.70% | 2.40% | 1.98% | 2.38% | 22.66% | 2.39% | 1.64% | 2.43% | 1.16% | 1.02% | 0.86% |
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF | 1.45% | 1.64% | 1.68% | 1.71% | 2.00% | 1.44% | 1.73% | 1.89% | 2.18% | 1.53% | 1.78% | 2.16% |
Drawdowns
FRNRX vs. FMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRNRX drawdown since its inception was -80.54%, which is greater than FMAT's maximum drawdown of -41.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRNRX and FMAT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRNRX | FMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.54% | -41.11% | -39.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.68% | -14.21% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.29% | -25.40% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.71% | -41.11% | -29.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.75% | -6.22% | +4.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.95% | -6.90% | -17.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 4.16% | -0.61% |
Volatility
FRNRX vs. FMAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Natural Resources Fund (FRNRX) is 5.41%, while Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) has a volatility of 6.76%. This indicates that FRNRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRNRX | FMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 6.76% | -1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.83% | 13.38% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.09% | 21.40% | -0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.82% | 19.54% | +6.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.70% | 21.14% | +7.56% |