PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRNRX vs. NANR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRNRX vs. NANR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Natural Resources Fund (FRNRX) and SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FRNRX having a 23.82% return and NANR slightly higher at 24.74%. Over the past 10 years, FRNRX has underperformed NANR with an annualized return of 11.27%, while NANR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.58% annualized return.


FRNRX

1D
0.80%
1M
0.11%
YTD
23.82%
6M
28.59%
1Y
55.75%
3Y*
20.96%
5Y*
23.31%
10Y*
11.27%

NANR

1D
1.67%
1M
2.67%
YTD
24.74%
6M
28.76%
1Y
55.64%
3Y*
21.02%
5Y*
16.60%
10Y*
12.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRNRX vs. NANR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRNRX
Franklin Natural Resources Fund
23.82%30.43%1.28%3.25%30.52%74.38%-21.58%10.03%-23.78%0.32%
NANR
SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF
24.74%35.35%2.31%-3.23%26.49%36.43%1.03%18.99%-16.77%8.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FRNRX and NANR is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2015

0.91

The correlation between FRNRX and NANR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRNRX vs. NANR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRNRX
FRNRX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FRNRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRNRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRNRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FRNRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRNRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

NANR
NANR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NANR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NANR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
NANR Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
NANR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
NANR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRNRX vs. NANR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Natural Resources Fund (FRNRX) and SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRNRXNANRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.60

3.09

+0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.46

3.82

+0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.51

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.87

6.64

+2.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

31.71

23.52

+8.19

FRNRX vs. NANR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRNRX Sharpe Ratio is 3.60, which is comparable to the NANR Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRNRX and NANR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRNRXNANRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.60

3.09

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.73

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.54

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.63

-0.34

Drawdowns

FRNRX vs. NANR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRNRX drawdown since its inception was -80.54%, which is greater than NANR's maximum drawdown of -49.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRNRX and NANR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRNRXNANRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.54%

-49.15%

-31.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.53%

-8.93%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.65%

-18.42%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.29%

-26.42%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.71%

-49.15%

-21.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-1.82%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.83%

-8.40%

-15.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

2.52%

-0.69%

Volatility

FRNRX vs. NANR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Natural Resources Fund (FRNRX) is 4.29%, while SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that FRNRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NANR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRNRXNANRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

4.89%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.82%

14.36%

-1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.33%

18.25%

-1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.57%

22.89%

+2.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.57%

23.54%

+5.03%

FRNRX vs. NANR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRNRX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than NANR's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRNRX vs. NANR - Dividend Comparison

FRNRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than NANR's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRNRX
Franklin Natural Resources Fund
1.37%1.70%2.40%1.98%2.38%22.66%2.39%1.64%2.43%1.16%1.02%0.86%
NANR
SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF
1.68%1.77%2.20%2.78%2.70%2.61%2.73%2.02%1.95%1.83%5.01%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FRNRX and NANR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NANR has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to FRNRX (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRNRX dropped -80.54% vs NANR's -49.15%.

FRNRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 3.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRNRX and NANR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer