FRIZ vs. FLTW
FRIZ (Franklin Dividend Growth ETF) and FLTW (Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FRIZ is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FLTW is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index. FRIZ is actively managed, while FLTW is passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FRIZ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLTW.
Performance
FRIZ vs. FLTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRIZ achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly lower than FLTW's 64.78% return.
FRIZ
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 2.17%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLTW
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 64.78%
- 6M
- 66.14%
- 1Y
- 93.92%
- 3Y*
- 40.57%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- —
FRIZ vs. FLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FRIZ Franklin Dividend Growth ETF | 2.17% | 3.22% |
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF | 64.78% | 12.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRIZ and FLTW is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRIZ vs. FLTW — Risk / Return Rank
FRIZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLTW
FRIZ vs. FLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Dividend Growth ETF (FRIZ) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FRIZ | FLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.53 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.68 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 25.37 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FRIZ vs. FLTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRIZ drawdown since its inception was -7.84%, smaller than the maximum FLTW drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIZ and FLTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRIZ | FLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -38.00% | +30.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -8.31% | +6.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.43% | -8.40% | +6.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.72% | — |
Volatility
FRIZ vs. FLTW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRIZ | FLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.97% | 29.04% | -19.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.97% | 23.23% | -13.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.97% | 22.20% | -12.23% |
FRIZ vs. FLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRIZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTW's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRIZ vs. FLTW - Dividend Comparison
FRIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than FLTW's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF | 1.64% | 2.51% | 1.89% | 2.85% | 3.16% | 2.31% | 2.14% | 3.00% | 1.06% |
FRIZ Franklin Dividend Growth ETF | 0.82% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRIZ and FLTW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLTW is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLTW is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FRIZ.
FLTW has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.82% for FRIZ.
FRIZ is categorized as Dividend, while FLTW is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FRIZ and 0.19% for FLTW.
Find the right allocation for FRIZ and FLTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer