FRIZ vs. FLTW

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FRIZ (Franklin Dividend Growth ETF) and FLTW (Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FRIZ is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FLTW is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index. FRIZ is actively managed, while FLTW is passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FRIZ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLTW.

Performance

FRIZ vs. FLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Dividend Growth ETF (FRIZ) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRIZ achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly lower than FLTW's 57.56% return.

FRIZ

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 1.07%
• YTD: 2.78%
• 6M: 2.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLTW

• 1D: -8.07%
• 1M: 4.16%
• YTD: 57.56%
• 6M: 60.89%
• 1Y: 100.55%
• 3Y*: 38.62%
• 5Y*: 19.56%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRIZ vs. FLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FRIZ Franklin Dividend Growth ETF	2.78%	3.14%
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF	57.56%	15.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FRIZ and FLTW is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025	0.54

Return for Risk

FRIZ vs. FLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTW

FLTW Risk / Return Rank: 94
FLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRIZ vs. FLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Dividend Growth ETF (FRIZ) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FRIZ	FLTW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.88	-0.10

Drawdowns

FRIZ vs. FLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRIZ drawdown since its inception was -7.84%, smaller than the maximum FLTW drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIZ and FLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRIZ	FLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.84%	-38.00%	+30.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.87%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-9.15%	+8.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.47%	-8.43%	+6.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.49%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FRIZ	FLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.68%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	23.11%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.15%	27.33%	-17.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.15%	22.73%	-12.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.15%	21.95%	-11.80%

FRIZ vs. FLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRIZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTW's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRIZ vs. FLTW - Dividend Comparison

FRIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than FLTW's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF	1.59%	2.51%	1.89%	2.85%	3.16%	2.31%	2.14%	3.00%	1.06%
FRIZ Franklin Dividend Growth ETF	0.50%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRIZ and FLTW in my portfolio?

FRIZ and FLTW have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FRIZ or FLTW?

On fees, FLTW is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FRIZ or FLTW?

FLTW is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FRIZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FRIZ or FLTW?

FLTW has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.50% for FRIZ.

What is the main difference between FRIZ and FLTW?

FRIZ is categorized as Dividend, while FLTW is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FRIZ and 0.19% for FLTW.