PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLTW vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLTW vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTW achieves a 53.07% return, which is significantly higher than VXUS's 12.75% return.


FLTW

1D
3.38%
1M
-8.11%
6M
41.10%
YTD
53.07%
1Y
78.62%
3Y*
36.54%
5Y*
18.91%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.45%

VXUS

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.29%
6M
6.78%
YTD
12.75%
1Y
27.56%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
9.44%
ALL TIME*
6.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$79.26M$58.46M$67.03M
$362.62M$406.11M$507.75M

FLTW vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
53.07%32.00%16.68%30.05%-27.51%29.46%29.77%31.23%-9.32%-1.28%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
12.75%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%2.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTW and VXUS is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.72

The correlation between FLTW and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLTW vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLTW
VXUS

Technology

77.2%
23.7%

Financial Services

12.5%
23.2%

Industrials

3.0%
14.5%

Basic Materials

2.9%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.6%
6.8%

Communication Services

1.3%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.7%
4.8%

Healthcare

0.7%
6.8%

Energy

0.1%
4.2%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Technology

FLTW
77.2%
VXUS
23.7%

Financial Services

FLTW
12.5%
VXUS
23.2%

Industrials

FLTW
3.0%
VXUS
14.5%

Basic Materials

FLTW
2.9%
VXUS
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FLTW
1.6%
VXUS
6.8%

Communication Services

FLTW
1.3%
VXUS
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

FLTW
0.7%
VXUS
4.8%

Healthcare

FLTW
0.7%
VXUS
6.8%

Energy

FLTW
0.1%
VXUS
4.2%

Real Estate

FLTW

-

VXUS
1.7%

Utilities

FLTW

-

VXUS
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLTW vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLTW
FLTW Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLTW vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLTWVXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.30

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

2.42

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.39

8.87

+6.52

FLTW vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTW Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTW and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLTW vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTW drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTW and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLTWVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.00%

-35.97%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.34%

-11.27%

-10.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.45%

-13.58%

-12.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.00%

-29.44%

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.83%

-2.84%

-11.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.43%

-8.16%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.16%

3.07%

+2.09%

Volatility

FLTW vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) has a higher volatility of 13.59% compared to Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) at 5.29%. This indicates that FLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLTWVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.59%

5.29%

+8.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.76%

15.06%

+13.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.00%

16.86%

+15.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.04%

16.35%

+7.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.60%

17.03%

+5.57%

FLTW vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTW has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLTW vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

FLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than VXUS's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
1.76%2.51%1.89%2.85%3.16%2.31%2.14%3.00%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.59%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLTW and VXUS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLTW has higher volatility (13.59%) compared to VXUS (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTW dropped -38.00% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

On 5-year performance, FLTW leads with 18.91% vs 8.78% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VXUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLTW has performed better with a 18.91% return vs 8.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLTW.

VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.76% for FLTW.

FLTW is categorized as Taiwan Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. FLTW tracks FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLTW and 0.05% for VXUS.

FLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLTW and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer