FRIZ vs. DLN
FRIZ (Franklin Dividend Growth ETF) and DLN (WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FRIZ is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while DLN is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. FRIZ is actively managed, while DLN is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FRIZ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DLN.
Performance
FRIZ vs. DLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRIZ achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly lower than DLN's 9.45% return.
FRIZ
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLN
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 22.58%
- 3Y*
- 18.26%
- 5Y*
- 12.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.55%
FRIZ vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FRIZ Franklin Dividend Growth ETF | 2.78% | 3.14% |
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 9.45% | 3.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRIZ and DLN is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRIZ vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank
FRIZ
DLN
FRIZ vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Dividend Growth ETF (FRIZ) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRIZ | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.53 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
FRIZ vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRIZ drawdown since its inception was -7.84%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIZ and DLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRIZ | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -57.84% | +50.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -1.19% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -7.52% | +6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.44% | — |
Volatility
FRIZ vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRIZ | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.15% | 8.97% | +1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 13.27% | -3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 16.16% | -6.01% |
FRIZ vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRIZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRIZ vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison
FRIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than DLN's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 1.80% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 2.43% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.66% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 2.33% | 2.64% | 2.80% |
FRIZ Franklin Dividend Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRIZ and DLN have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FRIZ.
DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.50% for FRIZ.
FRIZ is categorized as Dividend, while DLN is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FRIZ and 0.28% for DLN.
Find the right allocation for FRIZ and DLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer