FRHC vs. FTLF
FRHC (Freedom Holding Corp.) and FTLF (FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock) are both stocks. FRHC operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while FTLF operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, FRHC returned 18.64%/yr vs 18.62%/yr for FTLF. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FRHC vs. FTLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRHC achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly higher than FTLF's -32.33% return.
FRHC
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -2.60%
- YTD
- 13.58%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- -9.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.18%
- 5Y*
- 18.64%
- 10Y*
- —
FTLF
- 1D
- -4.92%
- 1M
- 15.53%
- YTD
- -32.33%
- 6M
- -38.73%
- 1Y
- -22.90%
- 3Y*
- 11.70%
- 5Y*
- 18.62%
- 10Y*
- 50.47%
FRHC vs. FTLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRHC Freedom Holding Corp. | 13.58% | -6.89% | 62.15% | 38.44% | -16.02% | 35.12% | 252.89% | 76.03% | 29.87% | 236.51% |
FTLF FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock | -32.33% | -0.18% | 70.68% | 19.75% | -0.31% | 196.30% | 53.19% | 3,182.89% | 78.96% | -25.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRHC and FTLF is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2017 | 0.04 |
Fundamentals
FRHC:
$0.04
FTLF:
$0.68
FRHC:
3.17K
FTLF:
16.26
FRHC:
278.17
FTLF:
1.79
FRHC:
3.99
FTLF:
1.56
FRHC:
$2.12B
FTLF:
$70.56M
FRHC:
$1.05B
FTLF:
$28.73M
FRHC:
$542.59M
FTLF:
$11.02M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRHC vs. FTLF — Risk / Return Rank
FRHC
FTLF
FRHC vs. FTLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC) and FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FRHC | FTLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.96 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | -0.40 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | -0.81 | +0.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FRHC vs. FTLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRHC drawdown since its inception was -45.93%, smaller than the maximum FTLF drawdown of -99.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRHC and FTLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRHC | FTLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.93% | -99.68% | +53.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.08% | -57.23% | +16.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.08% | -57.23% | +16.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.93% | -57.23% | +11.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.32% | -46.97% | +19.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.70% | -70.89% | +59.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.29% | 28.39% | -5.10% |
Volatility
FRHC vs. FTLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC) is 13.08%, while FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) has a volatility of 19.36%. This indicates that FRHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRHC | FTLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.08% | 19.36% | -6.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.16% | 37.63% | -9.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.90% | 52.03% | -13.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.95% | 45.37% | -7.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.72% | 305.80% | -258.08% |
Dividends
FRHC vs. FTLF - Dividend Comparison
Neither FRHC nor FTLF has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
FRHC vs. FTLF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Freedom Holding Corp. and FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FRHC and FTLF have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTLF has higher volatility (19.36%) compared to FRHC (13.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRHC dropped -45.93% vs FTLF's -99.68%.
FRHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRHC and FTLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer