PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRGAX vs. BLNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRGAX vs. BLNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRGAX achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly lower than BLNDX's 17.17% return.


FRGAX

1D
-0.59%
1M
2.80%
YTD
8.73%
6M
9.06%
1Y
21.41%
3Y*
16.10%
5Y*
10Y*

BLNDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.99%
YTD
17.17%
6M
18.61%
1Y
31.17%
3Y*
12.15%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRGAX vs. BLNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
8.73%17.10%12.91%17.57%-1.63%
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
17.17%4.12%13.11%5.79%-1.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FRGAX and BLNDX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022

0.65

The correlation between FRGAX and BLNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRGAX vs. BLNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

BLNDX
BLNDX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BLNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BLNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRGAX vs. BLNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRGAXBLNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.44

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

6.71

-3.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.01

21.52

-7.51

FRGAX vs. BLNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRGAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the BLNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRGAX and BLNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRGAXBLNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.52

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

1.06

+0.46

Drawdowns

FRGAX vs. BLNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRGAX drawdown since its inception was -11.77%, smaller than the maximum BLNDX drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRGAX and BLNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRGAXBLNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.77%

-17.69%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.03%

-4.75%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.77%

-17.69%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-1.14%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.58%

-3.19%

+1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

1.48%

+0.09%

Volatility

FRGAX vs. BLNDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) have volatilities of 2.80% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRGAXBLNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

2.92%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.22%

9.49%

-2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.05%

12.71%

-3.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.31%

11.66%

-1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.31%

11.75%

-1.44%

FRGAX vs. BLNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRGAX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than BLNDX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRGAX vs. BLNDX - Dividend Comparison

FRGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than BLNDX's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
0.63%0.73%5.74%3.71%2.67%6.11%1.21%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
1.84%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRGAX and BLNDX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLNDX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to FRGAX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRGAX dropped -11.77% vs BLNDX's -17.69%.

BLNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRGAX and BLNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer