PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRES.L vs. XRH0.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRES.L vs. XRH0.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fresnillo plc (FRES.L) and Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FRES.L is traded in GBp, while XRH0.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XRH0.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRES.L achieves a -15.96% return, which is significantly higher than XRH0.L's -26.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FRES.L has underperformed XRH0.L with an annualized return of 7.10%, while XRH0.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.35% annualized return.


FRES.L

1D
-1.44%
1M
-16.59%
YTD
-15.96%
6M
-17.88%
1Y
96.36%
3Y*
70.39%
5Y*
31.92%
10Y*
7.10%

XRH0.L

1D
1.66%
1M
-9.15%
YTD
-26.90%
6M
-22.53%
1Y
45.78%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
-14.54%
10Y*
27.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRES.L vs. XRH0.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRES.L
Fresnillo plc
-15.96%468.21%6.13%-32.98%3.90%-18.79%78.92%-24.01%-38.26%18.98%
XRH0.L
Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC
-26.90%183.48%-13.20%-62.77%6.90%-14.71%174.89%123.98%55.07%82.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FRES.L and XRH0.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2011

0.05

The correlation between FRES.L and XRH0.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRES.L vs. XRH0.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRES.L
FRES.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FRES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FRES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

XRH0.L
XRH0.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRES.L vs. XRH0.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fresnillo plc (FRES.L) and Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRES.LXRH0.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.18

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.14

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.08

2.17

+3.91

FRES.L vs. XRH0.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRES.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRES.L and XRH0.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRES.L vs. XRH0.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRES.L drawdown since its inception was -82.49%, roughly equal to the maximum XRH0.L drawdown of -84.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRES.L and XRH0.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRES.LXRH0.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.49%

-84.57%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.00%

-39.95%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.00%

-46.17%

+9.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.75%

-79.64%

+25.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.56%

-84.57%

+10.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.00%

-65.98%

+28.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.85%

-47.18%

+4.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.78%

21.01%

-5.23%

Volatility

FRES.L vs. XRH0.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fresnillo plc (FRES.L) is 16.50%, while Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a volatility of 27.80%. This indicates that FRES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XRH0.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRES.LXRH0.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.50%

27.80%

-11.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.75%

69.79%

-26.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.04%

89.33%

-33.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.80%

69.18%

-26.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.23%

66.47%

-23.24%

Dividends

FRES.L vs. XRH0.L - Dividend Comparison

FRES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, while XRH0.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRES.L
Fresnillo plc
3.47%2.00%1.36%1.98%2.44%2.66%1.00%2.35%3.49%1.73%
XRH0.L
Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRES.L and XRH0.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRES.L and XRH0.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer