FRES.L vs. GGP.L
FRES.L (Fresnillo plc) and GGP.L (Greatland Gold plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — FRES.L in Other Precious Metals & Mining, GGP.L in Gold. Over the past 10 years, FRES.L returned 7.10%/yr vs 59.55%/yr for GGP.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FRES.L vs. GGP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRES.L achieves a -15.96% return, which is significantly lower than GGP.L's 16.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FRES.L has underperformed GGP.L with an annualized return of 7.10%, while GGP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 59.55% annualized return.
FRES.L
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -16.59%
- YTD
- -15.96%
- 6M
- -17.88%
- 1Y
- 96.36%
- 3Y*
- 70.39%
- 5Y*
- 31.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
GGP.L
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- -16.85%
- YTD
- 16.92%
- 6M
- 16.74%
- 1Y
- 84.70%
- 3Y*
- 61.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.99%
- 10Y*
- 59.55%
FRES.L vs. GGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRES.L Fresnillo plc | -15.96% | 468.21% | 6.13% | -32.98% | 3.90% | -18.79% | 78.92% | -24.01% | -38.26% | 18.98% |
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 16.92% | 309.83% | -35.50% | 23.25% | -50.00% | -56.64% | 1,950.00% | -0.55% | -3.21% | 1,000.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRES.L and GGP.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2008 | 0.10 |
Over the past year, FRES.L and GGP.L have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
FRES.L:
£20.20B
GGP.L:
£4.17B
FRES.L:
$2.08
GGP.L:
£0.47
FRES.L:
17.49
GGP.L:
13.03
FRES.L:
3.33
GGP.L:
4.45
FRES.L:
5.77
GGP.L:
4.95
FRES.L:
$8.03B
GGP.L:
£937.29M
FRES.L:
$3.75B
GGP.L:
£483.25M
FRES.L:
$3.90B
GGP.L:
£477.73M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRES.L vs. GGP.L — Risk / Return Rank
FRES.L
GGP.L
FRES.L vs. GGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fresnillo plc (FRES.L) and Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FRES.L | GGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.25 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 2.63 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.08 | 6.65 | -0.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FRES.L vs. GGP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRES.L drawdown since its inception was -82.49%, smaller than the maximum GGP.L drawdown of -98.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRES.L and GGP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRES.L | GGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.49% | -98.49% | +16.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.00% | -32.07% | -4.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.00% | -55.65% | +18.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.75% | -76.50% | +22.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.56% | -86.35% | +11.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.00% | -23.29% | -13.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.85% | -65.59% | +22.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.78% | 12.70% | +3.08% |
Volatility
FRES.L vs. GGP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fresnillo plc (FRES.L) is 16.50%, while Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) has a volatility of 20.24%. This indicates that FRES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRES.L | GGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.50% | 20.24% | -3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.75% | 44.51% | -0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.04% | 64.07% | -8.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.80% | 65.16% | -22.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.23% | 90.86% | -47.63% |
Dividends
FRES.L vs. GGP.L - Dividend Comparison
FRES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, while GGP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRES.L Fresnillo plc | 3.47% | 2.00% | 1.36% | 1.98% | 2.44% | 2.66% | 1.00% | 2.35% | 3.49% | 1.73% |
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FRES.L vs. GGP.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fresnillo plc and Greatland Gold plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FRES.L vs. GGP.L - Profitability Comparison
FRES.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fresnillo plc reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 2.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.7%.
GGP.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported a gross profit of 245.52M and revenue of 478.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.3%.
FRES.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fresnillo plc reported an operating income of 1.39B and revenue of 2.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 53.5%.
GGP.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported an operating income of 236.40M and revenue of 478.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.4%.
FRES.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fresnillo plc reported a net income of 994.96M and revenue of 2.59B, resulting in a net margin of 38.4%.
GGP.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported a net income of 167.80M and revenue of 478.24M, resulting in a net margin of 35.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FRES.L and GGP.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FRES.L and GGP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer