FRES.L vs. BAB.L
FRES.L (Fresnillo plc) and BAB.L (Babcock International Group plc) are both stocks. FRES.L operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while BAB.L operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, FRES.L returned 12.24%/yr vs 2.11%/yr for BAB.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FRES.L vs. BAB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRES.L achieves a -7.34% return, which is significantly higher than BAB.L's -16.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FRES.L has outperformed BAB.L with an annualized return of 12.24%, while BAB.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.11% annualized return.
FRES.L
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -15.40%
- YTD
- -7.34%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 132.30%
- 3Y*
- 70.02%
- 5Y*
- 32.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.24%
BAB.L
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- -16.49%
- 6M
- -11.73%
- 1Y
- -1.13%
- 3Y*
- 49.51%
- 5Y*
- 29.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.11%
FRES.L vs. BAB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRES.L Fresnillo plc | -7.34% | 468.21% | 6.13% | -32.98% | 3.90% | -18.79% | 78.92% | -24.01% | -38.26% | 18.98% |
BAB.L Babcock International Group plc | -16.49% | 150.05% | 27.98% | 40.56% | -11.42% | 13.83% | -55.53% | 36.99% | -27.77% | -23.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRES.L and BAB.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2008 | 0.14 |
The correlation between FRES.L and BAB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (10 years) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FRES.L:
£22.27B
BAB.L:
£5.32B
FRES.L:
£2.08
BAB.L:
£0.94
FRES.L:
14.56
BAB.L:
11.09
FRES.L:
2.77
BAB.L:
0.56
FRES.L:
4.80
BAB.L:
7.35
FRES.L:
£8.03B
BAB.L:
£9.58B
FRES.L:
£3.75B
BAB.L:
£699.70M
FRES.L:
£3.90B
BAB.L:
£961.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRES.L vs. BAB.L — Risk / Return Rank
FRES.L
BAB.L
FRES.L vs. BAB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fresnillo plc (FRES.L) and Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRES.L | BAB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.02 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | -0.03 | +4.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.74 | -0.08 | +9.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRES.L | BAB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | -0.03 | +2.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.87 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.06 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.30 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
FRES.L vs. BAB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRES.L drawdown since its inception was -82.49%, roughly equal to the maximum BAB.L drawdown of -80.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRES.L and BAB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRES.L | BAB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.49% | -80.40% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.37% | -36.28% | +4.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.85% | -36.28% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.75% | -36.28% | -17.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.56% | -79.18% | +4.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.55% | -30.89% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.90% | -28.15% | -14.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.53% | 14.04% | -0.51% |
Volatility
FRES.L vs. BAB.L - Volatility Comparison
Fresnillo plc (FRES.L) has a higher volatility of 15.85% compared to Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) at 11.68%. This indicates that FRES.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRES.L | BAB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.85% | 11.68% | +4.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.01% | 25.79% | +16.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.99% | 34.92% | +20.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.40% | 33.56% | +8.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.40% | 36.38% | +7.02% |
Dividends
FRES.L vs. BAB.L - Dividend Comparison
FRES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than BAB.L's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAB.L Babcock International Group plc | 0.67% | 0.56% | 1.06% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.78% | 6.08% | 4.04% | 2.75% | 2.38% |
FRES.L Fresnillo plc | 3.15% | 2.00% | 1.36% | 1.98% | 2.44% | 2.66% | 1.00% | 2.35% | 3.49% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FRES.L vs. BAB.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fresnillo plc and Babcock International Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FRES.L vs. BAB.L - Profitability Comparison
FRES.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fresnillo plc reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 2.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.7%.
BAB.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported a gross profit of 234.30M and revenue of 2.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.
FRES.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fresnillo plc reported an operating income of 1.39B and revenue of 2.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 53.5%.
BAB.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported an operating income of 234.30M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
FRES.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fresnillo plc reported a net income of 994.96M and revenue of 2.59B, resulting in a net margin of 38.4%.
BAB.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported a net income of 169.30M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FRES.L and BAB.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FRES.L and BAB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer