BAB.L vs. BCKIY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BAB.L (Babcock International Group plc) and BCKIY (Babcock International Group PLC ADR) are both stocks. Both operate in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 5 years, BAB.L returned 28.29%/yr vs 33.42%/yr for BCKIY. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BAB.L vs. BCKIY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) and Babcock International Group PLC ADR (BCKIY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

BAB.L is traded in GBp, while BCKIY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BCKIY values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAB.L achieves a -17.02% return, which is significantly higher than BCKIY's -18.70% return.

BAB.L

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -6.23%
• YTD: -17.02%
• 6M: -8.68%
• 1Y: 1.62%
• 3Y*: 49.93%
• 5Y*: 28.29%
• 10Y*: 1.89%

BCKIY

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: -8.21%
• YTD: -18.70%
• 6M: -10.28%
• 1Y: -3.15%
• 3Y*: 53.04%
• 5Y*: 33.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAB.L vs. BCKIY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BAB.L Babcock International Group plc	-17.02%	150.05%	27.98%	40.56%	-11.42%	13.83%	-22.76%
BCKIY Babcock International Group PLC ADR	-18.70%	158.93%	33.82%	32.74%	-6.57%	38.52%	-66.14%

Correlation

The correlation between BAB.L and BCKIY is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020	0.18

Over the past year, BAB.L and BCKIY have become more correlated (0.87) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) BAB.L : £9.58B BCKIY : $9.22B
Gross Profit (TTM) BAB.L : £699.70M BCKIY : $609.60M
EBITDA (TTM) BAB.L : £961.50M BCKIY : $842.30M

Return for Risk

BAB.L vs. BCKIY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAB.L

BAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 39
BAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
BAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
BAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 37
BAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
BAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 41

BCKIY

BCKIY Risk / Return Rank: 36
BCKIY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
BCKIY Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
BCKIY Omega Ratio Rank: 33
BCKIY Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BCKIY Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAB.L vs. BCKIY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) and Babcock International Group PLC ADR (BCKIY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAB.L	BCKIY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.05	-0.08	+0.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.32	0.17	+0.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.02	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	-0.08	+0.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.12	-0.22	+0.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAB.L vs. BCKIY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is higher than the BCKIY Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAB.L and BCKIY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAB.L	BCKIY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05	-0.08	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	0.04	+0.80
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.01	+0.22

Drawdowns

BAB.L vs. BCKIY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAB.L drawdown since its inception was -81.10%, smaller than the maximum BCKIY drawdown of -97.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAB.L and BCKIY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAB.L	BCKIY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.10%	-97.77%	+16.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.28%	-37.98%	+1.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.28%	-37.98%	+1.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.28%	-94.25%	+57.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-79.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.32%	-33.47%	+2.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.12%	-31.95%	-3.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.68%	14.65%	-0.97%

Volatility

BAB.L vs. BCKIY - Volatility Comparison

Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) and Babcock International Group PLC ADR (BCKIY) have volatilities of 12.11% and 12.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAB.L	BCKIY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.11%	12.39%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.97%	26.64%	-0.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.57%	39.32%	-3.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.61%	868.29%	-834.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.39%	800.73%	-764.34%

Dividends

BAB.L vs. BCKIY - Dividend Comparison

BAB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, which matches BCKIY's 0.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAB.L Babcock International Group plc	0.68%	0.56%	1.06%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.78%	6.08%	4.04%	2.75%	2.38%
BCKIY Babcock International Group PLC ADR	0.68%	0.55%	1.11%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAB.L and BCKIY in my portfolio?

BAB.L and BCKIY have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.