BAB.L vs. RHM.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) and Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE).
Performance
BAB.L vs. RHM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BAB.L vs. RHM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAB.L Babcock International Group plc | 2.01% | 150.05% | 27.98% | 40.56% | -11.42% | 13.83% | -55.53% | 36.99% | -27.77% | -23.36% |
RHM.DE Rheinmetall AG | 1.61% | 168.55% | 107.08% | 53.69% | 140.63% | -8.70% | -3.71% | 28.50% | -24.99% | 75.69% |
Different Trading Currencies
BAB.L is traded in GBp, while RHM.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the RHM.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAB.L achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly higher than RHM.DE's 1.61% return. Over the past 10 years, BAB.L has underperformed RHM.DE with an annualized return of 4.85%, while RHM.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 40.81% annualized return.
BAB.L
- 1D
- 9.50%
- 1M
- -7.78%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 6M
- -0.72%
- 1Y
- 72.99%
- 3Y*
- 63.04%
- 5Y*
- 40.44%
- 10Y*
- 4.85%
RHM.DE
- 1D
- 9.63%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- -18.53%
- 1Y
- 22.96%
- 3Y*
- 81.13%
- 5Y*
- 81.23%
- 10Y*
- 40.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAB.L vs. RHM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BAB.L
RHM.DE
BAB.L vs. RHM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) and Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAB.L | RHM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.98 | 0.50 | +1.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.59 | 0.97 | +1.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.12 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 0.92 | +2.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.46 | 2.17 | +6.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAB.L | RHM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 0.50 | +1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | 1.95 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | 1.09 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.56 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between BAB.L and RHM.DE is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BAB.L vs. RHM.DE - Dividend Comparison
BAB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, more than RHM.DE's 0.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAB.L Babcock International Group plc | 0.55% | 0.56% | 1.06% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.78% | 6.08% | 4.04% | 2.75% | 2.38% |
RHM.DE Rheinmetall AG | 0.51% | 0.52% | 0.93% | 1.50% | 1.77% | 2.41% | 5.54% | 2.05% | 2.20% | 1.37% | 1.72% | 0.49% |
Drawdowns
BAB.L vs. RHM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAB.L drawdown since its inception was -81.10%, which is greater than RHM.DE's maximum drawdown of -71.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAB.L and RHM.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAB.L | RHM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.10% | -76.51% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.44% | -30.63% | +7.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.35% | -35.54% | +6.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.18% | -62.18% | -17.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.58% | -20.47% | +4.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.17% | -23.03% | -12.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.85% | 13.23% | -4.38% |
Volatility
BAB.L vs. RHM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) is 14.27%, while Rheinmetall AG (RHM.DE) has a volatility of 17.86%. This indicates that BAB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RHM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BAB.L | RHM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.27% | 17.86% | -3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.40% | 32.83% | -9.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.75% | 46.06% | -9.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.33% | 41.08% | -4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.13% | 37.30% | -1.17% |
Financials
BAB.L vs. RHM.DE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Babcock International Group plc and Rheinmetall AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities