BAB.L vs. ALTN.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) and AltynGold plc (ALTN.L).
Performance
BAB.L vs. ALTN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BAB.L vs. ALTN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAB.L Babcock International Group plc | 2.01% | 150.05% | 27.98% | 40.56% | -11.42% | 13.83% | -55.53% | 36.99% | -27.77% | -23.36% |
ALTN.L AltynGold plc | 0.00% | 546.60% | 80.19% | 28.48% | -27.95% | 0.66% | 121.95% | -10.87% | -53.44% | -33.24% |
Fundamentals
BAB.L:
£9.58B
ALTN.L:
£160.96M
BAB.L:
£699.70M
ALTN.L:
£72.11M
BAB.L:
£961.50M
ALTN.L:
£68.40M
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, BAB.L has underperformed ALTN.L with an annualized return of 4.85%, while ALTN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 21.97% annualized return.
BAB.L
- 1D
- 9.50%
- 1M
- -7.78%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 6M
- -0.72%
- 1Y
- 72.99%
- 3Y*
- 63.04%
- 5Y*
- 40.44%
- 10Y*
- 4.85%
ALTN.L
- 1D
- 11.26%
- 1M
- -20.58%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 38.76%
- 1Y
- 245.94%
- 3Y*
- 108.50%
- 5Y*
- 54.56%
- 10Y*
- 21.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAB.L vs. ALTN.L — Risk / Return Rank
BAB.L
ALTN.L
BAB.L vs. ALTN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) and AltynGold plc (ALTN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAB.L | ALTN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.98 | 3.39 | -1.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.59 | 3.41 | -0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.42 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 5.83 | -2.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.46 | 21.45 | -12.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAB.L | ALTN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 3.39 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | 0.89 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | 0.27 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.03 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between BAB.L and ALTN.L is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BAB.L vs. ALTN.L - Dividend Comparison
BAB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while ALTN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAB.L Babcock International Group plc | 0.55% | 0.56% | 1.06% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.78% | 6.08% | 4.04% | 2.75% | 2.38% |
ALTN.L AltynGold plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BAB.L vs. ALTN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAB.L drawdown since its inception was -81.10%, smaller than the maximum ALTN.L drawdown of -98.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAB.L and ALTN.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAB.L | ALTN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.10% | -98.52% | +17.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.44% | -45.18% | +21.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.35% | -58.63% | +29.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.18% | -85.43% | +6.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.58% | -43.74% | +28.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.17% | -75.80% | +40.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.85% | 12.27% | -3.42% |
Volatility
BAB.L vs. ALTN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) is 14.27%, while AltynGold plc (ALTN.L) has a volatility of 29.46%. This indicates that BAB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALTN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BAB.L | ALTN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.27% | 29.46% | -15.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.40% | 53.86% | -30.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.75% | 72.06% | -35.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.33% | 61.24% | -24.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.13% | 82.28% | -46.15% |
Financials
BAB.L vs. ALTN.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Babcock International Group plc and AltynGold plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities