PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FREL vs. SPDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FREL vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FREL achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than SPDW's 14.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FREL has underperformed SPDW with an annualized return of 6.17%, while SPDW has yielded a comparatively higher 10.64% annualized return.


FREL

1D
1.01%
1M
3.49%
YTD
12.39%
6M
12.21%
1Y
13.87%
3Y*
10.11%
5Y*
2.49%
10Y*
6.17%

SPDW

1D
0.29%
1M
1.53%
YTD
14.86%
6M
16.65%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
19.01%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
10.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FREL vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FREL
Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF
12.39%3.09%5.05%11.74%-26.21%40.46%-4.99%28.78%-4.52%8.86%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
14.86%34.75%3.55%17.81%-15.98%11.45%9.90%22.41%-14.22%25.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FREL and SPDW is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2015

0.54

The correlation between FREL and SPDW shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FREL vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FREL
FREL Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FREL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FREL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FREL Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FREL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FREL Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SPDW
SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FREL vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRELSPDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.33

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

2.58

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.80

9.95

-5.15

FREL vs. SPDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FREL Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the SPDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FREL and SPDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FREL vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FREL drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FREL and SPDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRELSPDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.61%

-60.02%

+17.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.45%

-11.55%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

-13.53%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.40%

-30.21%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.61%

-34.98%

-7.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.99%

+0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.93%

-12.89%

+2.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.99%

-0.31%

Volatility

FREL vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) is 4.74%, while SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that FREL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRELSPDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

6.86%

-2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.79%

14.23%

-4.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.54%

16.51%

-2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.89%

16.66%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.70%

17.31%

+3.39%

FREL vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FREL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FREL vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison

FREL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than SPDW's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FREL
Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF
3.20%3.59%3.48%3.73%3.57%2.34%3.77%3.32%5.54%3.27%4.01%3.80%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
2.87%3.30%3.19%2.75%3.12%3.04%1.87%3.13%3.08%1.86%3.11%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


FREL and SPDW have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPDW has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to FREL (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FREL dropped -42.61% vs SPDW's -60.02%.

On 10-year performance, SPDW leads with 10.64% vs 6.17% for FREL. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FREL has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPDW has performed better with a 10.64% return vs 6.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for FREL.

FREL has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 2.87% for SPDW.

FREL is categorized as REIT, while SPDW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FREL tracks MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index, while SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FREL and 0.04% for SPDW.

SPDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FREL and SPDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer