PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRDTX vs. FNSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRDTX vs. FNSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C (FRDTX) and Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRDTX achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly lower than FNSTX's 10.08% return.


FRDTX

1D
0.48%
1M
3.33%
YTD
5.53%
6M
5.01%
1Y
14.51%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*
11.98%

FNSTX

1D
1.93%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
10.08%
6M
9.33%
1Y
26.54%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRDTX vs. FNSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FRDTX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C
5.53%11.13%21.73%11.27%-11.36%25.67%15.42%4.92%
FNSTX
Fidelity Infrastructure Fund
10.08%27.42%14.43%8.44%-7.59%7.58%12.80%5.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FRDTX and FNSTX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2019

0.70

The correlation between FRDTX and FNSTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRDTX vs. FNSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRDTX
FRDTX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FRDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FNSTX
FNSTX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FNSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRDTX vs. FNSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C (FRDTX) and Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRDTXFNSTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

1.77

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.20

2.36

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.32

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

3.25

-1.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.27

11.01

-2.74

FRDTX vs. FNSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRDTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the FNSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRDTX and FNSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRDTXFNSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.77

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.71

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.62

-0.05

Drawdowns

FRDTX vs. FNSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRDTX drawdown since its inception was -52.13%, which is greater than FNSTX's maximum drawdown of -35.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDTX and FNSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRDTXFNSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.13%

-35.82%

-16.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.20%

-8.43%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.54%

-13.63%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.53%

-21.97%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.84%

+2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.55%

-5.17%

-1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

2.49%

-0.64%

Volatility

FRDTX vs. FNSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C (FRDTX) is 2.29%, while Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that FRDTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRDTXFNSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

5.45%

-3.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.69%

12.63%

-4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.15%

15.51%

-5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.46%

15.15%

+2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.13%

18.77%

-0.64%

FRDTX vs. FNSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRDTX has a 1.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FNSTX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRDTX vs. FNSTX - Dividend Comparison

FRDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.20%, more than FNSTX's 3.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNSTX
Fidelity Infrastructure Fund
3.80%4.16%1.59%1.85%1.35%0.63%0.80%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FRDTX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C
9.20%9.73%19.21%3.91%4.27%3.95%0.17%2.35%4.44%2.59%2.61%4.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRDTX and FNSTX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNSTX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to FRDTX (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRDTX dropped -52.13% vs FNSTX's -35.82%.

FNSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRDTX and FNSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer