FNSTX vs. UTF

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FNSTX (Fidelity Infrastructure Fund) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while UTF (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, FNSTX returned 10.43%/yr vs 7.52%/yr for UTF. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

FNSTX vs. UTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNSTX achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 17.41% return.

FNSTX

• 1D: -1.61%
• 1M: -0.97%
• YTD: 9.54%
• 6M: 8.76%
• 1Y: 23.33%
• 3Y*: 18.61%
• 5Y*: 10.43%
• 10Y*: —

UTF

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 1.77%
• YTD: 17.41%
• 6M: 16.78%
• 1Y: 12.45%
• 3Y*: 15.94%
• 5Y*: 7.52%
• 10Y*: 11.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNSTX vs. UTF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FNSTX Fidelity Infrastructure Fund	9.54%	27.42%	14.43%	8.44%	-7.59%	7.58%	12.80%	5.49%
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc	17.41%	9.93%	22.37%	-3.83%	-9.60%	17.91%	6.93%	-2.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FNSTX and UTF is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2019	0.57

The correlation between FNSTX and UTF shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FNSTX vs. UTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNSTX

FNSTX Risk / Return Rank: 42
FNSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FNSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FNSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FNSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FNSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

UTF

UTF Risk / Return Rank: 67
UTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
UTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
UTF Omega Ratio Rank: 65
UTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
UTF Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNSTX vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNSTX	UTF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	1.01	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	1.47	+0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.18	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.96	1.21	+1.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.16	2.47	+6.69

FNSTX vs. UTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNSTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the UTF Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNSTX and UTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNSTX vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNSTX drawdown since its inception was -35.82%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNSTX and UTF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNSTX	UTF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.82%	-72.62%	+36.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.43%	-10.33%	+1.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.63%	-21.06%	+7.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.97%	-30.28%	+8.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-52.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.32%	-0.40%	-2.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.16%	-10.35%	+5.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	5.05%	-2.33%

Volatility

FNSTX vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX) has a higher volatility of 5.90% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 2.46%. This indicates that FNSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNSTX	UTF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.90%	2.46%	+3.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.04%	8.35%	+4.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.17%	12.36%	+3.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.27%	18.28%	-3.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.78%	23.35%	-4.57%

Dividends

FNSTX vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison

FNSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than UTF's 6.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNSTX Fidelity Infrastructure Fund	3.82%	4.16%	1.59%	1.85%	1.35%	0.63%	0.80%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc	6.90%	7.62%	7.74%	8.76%	7.75%	6.53%	7.20%	7.10%	10.12%	7.37%	10.51%	8.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNSTX and UTF in my portfolio?

FNSTX and UTF have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNSTX or UTF?

FNSTX has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to UTF (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNSTX dropped -35.82% vs UTF's -72.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.