FRDM vs. DRAM

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

FRDM (Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FRDM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the Life + Liberty Freedom 100 Emerging Markets Index, while DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. FRDM is passively managed, while DRAM is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FRDM charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.

Performance

FRDM vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FRDM

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -14.88%
• 6M: 16.73%
• YTD: 26.86%
• 1Y: 62.81%
• 3Y*: 29.03%
• 5Y*: 16.96%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.82%

DRAM

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: -30.83%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRDM vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF	15.99%
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	96.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FRDM and DRAM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026	0.85

FRDM vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FRDM	DRAM
Financial Services	15.3%	-2.3%
Technology	8.2%	100.0%
Consumer Cyclical	3.6%	-
Basic Materials	3.4%	-
Real Estate	2.3%	-
Energy	1.7%	-
Utilities	1.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	-
Communication Services	0.6%	-
Industrials	0.3%	-
Healthcare	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

FRDM vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRDM

FRDM Risk / Return Rank: 84
FRDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FRDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FRDM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FRDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FRDM Martin Ratio Rank: 84

DRAM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRDM vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FRDM	DRAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.74	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.45	—	—

Drawdowns

FRDM vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRDM drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -35.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDM and DRAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRDM	DRAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.49%	-35.16%	-5.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.99%	-34.27%	+19.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.09%	-7.58%	+0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.06%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FRDM	DRAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.98%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.60%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.70%	96.38%	-66.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.10%	96.38%	-74.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.48%	96.38%	-72.90%

FRDM vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRDM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRDM vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

FRDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF	1.71%	2.26%	2.53%	2.66%	2.72%	2.17%	1.11%	1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRDM and DRAM in my portfolio?

FRDM and DRAM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FRDM or DRAM?

On fees, FRDM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FRDM or DRAM?

FRDM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FRDM or DRAM?

FRDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

What is the main difference between FRDM and DRAM?

FRDM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while DRAM is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Freedom Funds and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FRDM and 0.65% for DRAM.