PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRCK.DE vs. XQUD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRCK.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE) and Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRCK.DE achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly lower than XQUD.DE's 1.98% return.


FRCK.DE

1D
0.27%
1M
1.11%
YTD
1.67%
6M
2.34%
1Y
10.92%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*
1.49%

XQUD.DE

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.14%
YTD
1.98%
6M
1.13%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
2.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRCK.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FRCK.DE and XQUD.DE is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2022

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between FRCK.DE and XQUD.DE has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRCK.DE vs. XQUD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRCK.DE
FRCK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FRCK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRCK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRCK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FRCK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRCK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

XQUD.DE
XQUD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XQUD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRCK.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE) and Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRCK.DEXQUD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.19

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

1.56

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.09

4.64

+5.45

FRCK.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRCK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the XQUD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRCK.DE and XQUD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRCK.DEXQUD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

1.04

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.29

-0.12

Drawdowns

FRCK.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRCK.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, which is greater than XQUD.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRCK.DE and XQUD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRCK.DEXQUD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.71%

-12.01%

-20.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.49%

-3.84%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.78%

-11.40%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-2.99%

+2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.76%

-5.54%

-3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

1.30%

-0.22%

Volatility

FRCK.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.80% compared to Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE) at 1.12%. This indicates that FRCK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XQUD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRCK.DEXQUD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.80%

1.12%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.38%

3.74%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.38%

5.77%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.01%

7.98%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.29%

7.98%

+1.31%

FRCK.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRCK.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than XQUD.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRCK.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FRCK.DE nor XQUD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FRCK.DE and XQUD.DE have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FRCK.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FRCK.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XQUD.DE.

FRCK.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped (EUR Hedged), while XQUD.DE tracks iBoxx® MSCI ESG USD Emerging Markets Sovereigns Quality Weighted. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for FRCK.DE and 0.45% for XQUD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRCK.DE and XQUD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer