PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XQUD.DE vs. GHYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XQUD.DE vs. GHYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE) and iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF (GHYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XQUD.DE is traded in EUR, while GHYG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GHYG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XQUD.DE achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly higher than GHYG's 1.72% return.


XQUD.DE

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.14%
YTD
1.98%
6M
1.13%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
2.35%
5Y*
10Y*

GHYG

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.98%
YTD
1.72%
6M
1.68%
1Y
4.50%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
4.23%
10Y*
4.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XQUD.DE vs. GHYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XQUD.DE
Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF
1.98%-1.36%5.23%3.70%-0.16%
GHYG
iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF
1.72%-1.93%12.84%9.90%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between XQUD.DE and GHYG is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2022

0.56

The correlation between XQUD.DE and GHYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XQUD.DE vs. GHYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XQUD.DE
XQUD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XQUD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

GHYG
GHYG Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GHYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XQUD.DE vs. GHYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE) and iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF (GHYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XQUD.DEGHYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.16

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.74

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.64

4.86

-0.22

XQUD.DE vs. GHYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XQUD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the GHYG Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XQUD.DE and GHYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XQUD.DEGHYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

0.87

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.57

-0.28

Drawdowns

XQUD.DE vs. GHYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQUD.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.01%, smaller than the maximum GHYG drawdown of -26.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQUD.DE and GHYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XQUD.DEGHYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.01%

-26.69%

+14.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.84%

-2.61%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.40%

-9.94%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.99%

-2.35%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-3.62%

-1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

0.93%

+0.37%

Volatility

XQUD.DE vs. GHYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE) is 1.12%, while iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF (GHYG) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that XQUD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GHYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XQUD.DEGHYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

1.27%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.74%

3.65%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.77%

5.20%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.98%

7.23%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.98%

9.02%

-1.04%

XQUD.DE vs. GHYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XQUD.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than GHYG's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XQUD.DE vs. GHYG - Dividend Comparison

XQUD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GHYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GHYG
iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bond ETF
6.24%6.03%6.11%5.60%4.64%4.57%4.36%4.61%5.62%4.60%4.61%4.79%
XQUD.DE
Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XQUD.DE and GHYG have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GHYG is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GHYG is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XQUD.DE.

XQUD.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while GHYG is High Yield Bonds. XQUD.DE tracks iBoxx® MSCI ESG USD Emerging Markets Sovereigns Quality Weighted, while GHYG tracks Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XQUD.DE and 0.40% for GHYG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XQUD.DE and GHYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer