PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XQUD.DE vs. ENDH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XQUD.DE vs. ENDH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (ENDH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XQUD.DE achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly higher than ENDH.DE's -0.08% return.


XQUD.DE

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.14%
YTD
1.98%
6M
1.13%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
2.35%
5Y*
10Y*

ENDH.DE

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
-0.08%
6M
0.41%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
6.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XQUD.DE vs. ENDH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XQUD.DE and ENDH.DE is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2022

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between XQUD.DE and ENDH.DE has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XQUD.DE vs. ENDH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XQUD.DE
XQUD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XQUD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

ENDH.DE
ENDH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ENDH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENDH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENDH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ENDH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENDH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XQUD.DE vs. ENDH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (ENDH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XQUD.DEENDH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.20

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.73

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.64

6.28

-1.64

XQUD.DE vs. ENDH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XQUD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the ENDH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XQUD.DE and ENDH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XQUD.DEENDH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

0.92

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.86

-0.57

Drawdowns

XQUD.DE vs. ENDH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQUD.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.01%, which is greater than ENDH.DE's maximum drawdown of -6.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQUD.DE and ENDH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XQUD.DEENDH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.01%

-6.78%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.84%

-2.21%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.40%

-2.71%

-8.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.99%

-1.33%

-1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-1.11%

-4.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

0.61%

+0.69%

Volatility

XQUD.DE vs. ENDH.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE) is 1.12%, while L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (ENDH.DE) has a volatility of 2.69%. This indicates that XQUD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENDH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XQUD.DEENDH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

2.69%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.74%

3.74%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.77%

4.17%

+1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.98%

4.89%

+3.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.98%

4.89%

+3.09%

XQUD.DE vs. ENDH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XQUD.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ENDH.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

XQUD.DE vs. ENDH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XQUD.DE nor ENDH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XQUD.DE and ENDH.DE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ENDH.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ENDH.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XQUD.DE.

XQUD.DE tracks iBoxx® MSCI ESG USD Emerging Markets Sovereigns Quality Weighted, while ENDH.DE tracks J.P. Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified Short-Term Custom Maturity (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XQUD.DE and 0.28% for ENDH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XQUD.DE and ENDH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer